Article

2006-08-27 India-Pakistan

Confused generations - the brainwashing of Pak children

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by john 2006-08-27 09:56|| || Front Page|| [11129 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Our children have been convinced that the Hindus and the Muslims are different people. Their religion, their culture, their traditions and their festivals are different. Therefore it was not possible for the two communities to live together. Thus, a separate homeland was essential for the Muslims of the subcontinent.

The big lie. Necessary to justify partition and the creation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Posted by john 2006-08-27 10:02|| 2006-08-27 10:02|| Front Page Top

#2 But john, would I be correct in thinking that Pakland was not nearly enough, and that the sons of Allan look covetously at the entire subcontinent and plot for the day they may claim India too?

Posted by Seafarious">Seafarious 2006-08-27 10:06|| 2006-08-27 10:06|| Front Page Top

#3 J.N. Dixit, the Indian National Security Advisor wrote of going to dinner at the home of some Pakistani friends during his stint as Ambassador to Pakistan. While he and his wife waited for dinner to be served, a young child entered the room. Her parents told her that "uncle and aunty are from India".

The little girl got immensely excited and began "dancing around them gaily, singing Hindu Kutta, Hindu Kutta, Hindu Kutta much to the embarrassment of her parents."

(Hindu Kutta = Hindu Dog)

Dixit pointed out that while Indian textbooks bent over backwards to encourage secularism and tolerance of minorities (India having the second largest population of muslims in the world), Pakistan was bringing up its children to hate India and Indians. The trouble with the peaceniks, he said, with their Pollyanna approach to foreign policy, is that they forgot that the mindsets were not the same on both sides of the border.

Posted by john 2006-08-27 10:10|| 2006-08-27 10:10|| Front Page Top

#4 sons of Allan look covetously at the entire subcontinent and plot for the day they may claim India too?

Indeed.. the most rabid of the islamists actually opposed partition. They saw it as hindering the triumph of islam. The Ulema of the Jammat Islamii called Pakistan "the work of the devil".

Imam Sayyid Maududi.. whose writings (along with Sayyid Qutb) provide the intellectual foundation for islamo-fascism opposed Pakistan. Only afterwards did he migrate, finding fertile soil there to inculcate his poison.

Incidently, in one of the early Osama videos, where OBL's Kalasknikov is propped up against a bookcase, the books of Maududi and Qubt are prominent.

Posted by john 2006-08-27 10:17|| 2006-08-27 10:17|| Front Page Top

#5 India was a peaceful home to Hindus a thousand years ago until Mooselimbs invaded and conquered and slaughtered. They were only overturned by the armies of Genhis Khan who basically slaughtered all Mooselimb men, women, and children they could find. Hindus were able to regain prominence, but did not follow thru and exterminate the remaining Mooselimbs. Like the rat pack they are, they have bred their way back to near prominence again. They intend to fully recover "their" territory, the entire subcontinent. I really don't know how the Hindus have accomodated this horde over the centuries. Nothing but ongoing misery from these subhuman nihlists.

Posted by SOP35/Rat 2006-08-27 13:35|| 2006-08-27 13:35|| Front Page Top

#6 Actually the descendents of Genghis, when they invaded India were already muslim. They spread Islam further.

The Mughal Emperors styled themselves "the house of Timur" - Timur or Tamerlane was a direct descendent of Genghis Khan.

The Rajput kings, the Marathas and the Sikhs all fought muslim rule.

Some historians speculate that their reconquest would have succeeeded, driving islam out, but for the arrival of the British East India compnay and the Raj.

Posted by john 2006-08-27 13:49|| 2006-08-27 13:49|| Front Page Top

#7 The pre-Moghul Hindus weren't exactly lovers of peace and harmony, despite a religion that calls for falling in caste in the next reincarnation for acts of violence or harm. As I recall, the caste immediately below that of the Brahmin priests is that of the warriors, who generally didn't sit in full lotus meditating on the oneness of all.

Posted by trailing wife 2006-08-27 15:33|| 2006-08-27 15:33|| Front Page Top

23:49 Zenster
23:45 Swamp Blondie
23:40 JosephMendiola
23:28 JosephMendiola
23:26 3dc
23:24 Fred
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:10 Angolutch Thitle1329
23:04 RD
22:51 anymouse
22:49 Swamp Blondie
22:49 anymouse
22:48 Old Patriot
22:40 Patrick
22:36 Patrick
22:34 twobyfour
22:33 anymouse
22:27 Phineter Thraviger1073
22:26 anymouse
22:24 anymouse
22:12 anymouse
22:11 anymouse
22:06 Old Patriot