Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 08/02/2008 View Fri 08/01/2008 View Thu 07/31/2008 View Wed 07/30/2008 View Tue 07/29/2008 View Mon 07/28/2008 View Sun 07/27/2008
1
2008-08-02 Iraq
4% of Iraqi civilians killed in war
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-08-02 09:50|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 So it's 4%.
They shouldn't have screwed with us.
Do it again and we'll make it 40.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-08-02 10:39||   2008-08-02 10:39|| Front Page Top

#2 Lancet study? They are still kicking around that discredited piece of shite?
Posted by OldSpook 2008-08-02 11:11||   2008-08-02 11:11|| Front Page Top

#3 A million? (Says the headline) I thought Lancet 'counted' 600,000. There's been 400,000 since then? Where is the outrage, indeed!

Oh, and the outrage for Darfur? Rwanda? Zimbabwe? North Korea? Cambodia? Kurds? Jews?
Posted by Bobby 2008-08-02 11:19||   2008-08-02 11:19|| Front Page Top

#4 They quote, once again, the disreputable Johns Hopkins study. The moonbats won't let go of that.
Posted by Steve White 2008-08-02 11:26||   2008-08-02 11:26|| Front Page Top

#5 Let's not forget that Iraqis and their neighbors were being killed by Saddam and his cronies day after day before his government was conquered. The current estimate of people not killed by Saddam is 270822 since "Mission Accomplished". Further, many of the casualties since then were in fact due to deposed Saddam and his dead enders. So, trying to judge if things are going well or poorly in Iraq should focus on indicators different than than the casualty count, like newspapers, GDP, sanitation, electrification, infant mortality or consumer sentiment.
Posted by rammer">rammer  2008-08-02 11:32|| www.blogoram.com]">[www.blogoram.com]  2008-08-02 11:32|| Front Page Top

#6 The results were published in the highly regarded medical journal Lancet in October 2004.

I know it WAS highly regarded, but is it STILL?
Posted by eLarson 2008-08-02 13:54||   2008-08-02 13:54|| Front Page Top

#7 There is no "accurate count." There will be no accurate count. This is all speculation and BS. "Unknown Percentage of Iraqi Civilians Killed in War" just doesn't make a good headline.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2008-08-02 15:02||   2008-08-02 15:02|| Front Page Top

#8 Proper graphic: "Oh no, not this sh*t again!"

"A lie told often enough becomes truth" -- Vladimir Lenin
Posted by Darrell 2008-08-02 16:31||   2008-08-02 16:31|| Front Page Top

23:07 3dc
22:58 Barbara Skolaut
22:52 Barbara Skolaut
22:51 Barbara Skolaut
22:27 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
22:23 Spike Uniter
22:15 ryuge
22:03 swksvolFF
21:51 CrazyFool
21:45 Anonymoose
21:28 Leonard Plynth Garnell
21:27 tipper
20:53 Procopius2k
20:42 OldSpook
20:34 OldSpook
20:33 Mike Kozlowski
20:32 OldSpook
20:24 penguin
20:15 bigjim-ky
20:13 Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields
20:01 Pappy
20:00 Pappy
19:50 bigjim-ky
19:50 imoyaro









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com