Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 09/08/2008 View Sun 09/07/2008 View Sat 09/06/2008 View Fri 09/05/2008 View Thu 09/04/2008 View Wed 09/03/2008 View Tue 09/02/2008
1
2008-09-08 Home Front: Politix
Lynn Westmoreland calls Obama 'uppity'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2008-09-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 what an incredibly stupid thing for her to say. Did the Obama campaign pay her to say it?

I'm no fan of Obama, but even I am deeply offended by her comment.
Posted by Betty Grating2215 2008-09-08 00:41||   2008-09-08 00:41|| Front Page Top

#2 Westmoreland is conservative, pro-Life second term Congressman. In the State of Georgia when referring to the Obama's, the word "uppity" might be described as a .... charitable term of endearment. At least anywhere outside of Fulton County. Westmoreland's got a considerable amount in common with the Palin family as far as his beliefs, upbringing and background.

Posted by Besoeker 2008-09-08 03:12||   2008-09-08 03:12|| Front Page Top

#3 Perhaps snobbish or arrogant may have been better choices. (Both from the dictionary under "uppity").
Posted by Gladys 2008-09-08 06:05||   2008-09-08 06:05|| Front Page Top

#4 "articulate and clean. A storybook, really"

/Plugz
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2008-09-08 06:11||   2008-09-08 06:11|| Front Page Top

#5 I don't know about you guys but I'm damned sick of the double standard. Here's a quote from three days ago taken from a 'Burg story about Mexico undergoing a "legal revolution."

Judges — not juries of peers — will still determine guilt or innocence. "This is not a copy of the gringo system," Gonzalez told the class.

It's fine for whites to be called gringos, is it? Let's change that sentence and its attribution and see how it sounds:

"Judges — not juries of peers — will still determine guilt or innocence. "This is not a copy of the spick system," Buchanan told the class."

Think that still would have flown by without comment on Yahoo!?

If this Westmoreland guy wants to call Obama not just "uppity" but an "uppity nigger," he certainly can. Would doing so be helpful, clarifying or beneficial to anyone involved in the debate? No. Nor was Gonzales' remark about gringos. It was a flippant, off the cuff, racial insult by someone used to insulting whites without any repercussions. Seems like there's a lot of that these days.

The difference is that if Westmoreland actually did call Obama an uppity nigger there would be hell to pay in the press while cracks about "gringos" simply go totally unremarked. The double standard couldn't be more blatant.

That's a crock. If racial epithets are going to be taboo, then they damned well need to be taboo for EVERYBODY, not just those favored by the left. If the "rules" aren't going to be enforced evenhandedly, or enforced only against whites, no one has any cause for being surprised when whites decline to play patsy for racists from other ethnic groups. Either ALL of the epithets are out of bounds, or none of them are.

It's long past time the nonwhite racists got a taste of their own, politically correct medicine.



Posted by Jolutch Mussolini 7800 2008-09-08 07:06||   2008-09-08 07:06|| Front Page Top

#6 Yeah, there's a double standard, but this was still a stupid thing to say. He could have said, "they're a member of an elitist-class individual that thinks that they're better than the rest of us" and it would've gotten the point across better.
Posted by Mike 2008-09-08 08:03||   2008-09-08 08:03|| Front Page Top

#7 My late father used to say why is it bad when I say nigger and and it's not bad when black say nigger.

I said: It sounds better when they say it.
Posted by Ebbinter the Rasher of Bacon4084 2008-09-08 08:13|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2008-09-08 08:13|| Front Page Top

#8 foolish thing to say, and we need to stay out of the race card debate. There's so many many many other valid things to despise Obama over. Elitist? Yes. Uppity? Ixnay
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2008-09-08 08:33||   2008-09-08 08:33|| Front Page Top

#9 I would've said he's a lightweight empty suit that can give a good speech with a teleprompter - far more on point...but that's just me.

The "uppity" thing is a double-standard I've witnessed blacks saying that to or about each other. Race and gender politics make me nausious.

The whole presidential race of today is nothing more then a twisted popularity/beauty contest. I respect Palin and McCain. I strongly dislike a lot of McCain's policies and stances in the past. The sad thing is almost none of these people honestly should be anywhere near the white house. The fact that Obama has made it this far is proof positive that there are a scary amount of Americans that are morons.
Posted by Broadhead6 2008-09-08 09:15||   2008-09-08 09:15|| Front Page Top

#10 Broadhead

Did you vote in the ptimeries? No? At this point I could tall you to put up but I would tell you that you should consider yourself fortunate to live in America instead of Europe: our candidates are still worse than yours and in adition they are selected by a few tens of thousands (at best), memebers of politrical parties in a process who
is anythoing but transparent and then we are told to go to vote for teh guy our betters (the Party memebers) have selected.

Posted by JFM">JFM  2008-09-08 09:44||   2008-09-08 09:44|| Front Page Top

#11 Not quite so many, Broadhead6. Obama is the candidate of the Democratic party because he gamed the primary system -- not because he actually carried the states that are will be in play in November. It will be interesting to see whether the party muckety-mucks decide to change that for next time.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2008-09-08 09:47||   2008-09-08 09:47|| Front Page Top

#12 Oh jeezs.... Uppity isn't racial. Typical MSM trying to smear as much as they can. How about this MSM?

Obama is a elitist, out of touch, snobbish, boorish, stupid, boring, arrogant, communist fool.

And you can quote me on that, turdheads.
Posted by DarthVader 2008-09-08 10:08||   2008-09-08 10:08|| Front Page Top

#13 The problem with going into the gutter to fight double standards is that two wrongs don't make a right.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-09-08 10:11||   2008-09-08 10:11|| Front Page Top

#14 No, but two Wrights can make an airplane.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2008-09-08 10:29||   2008-09-08 10:29|| Front Page Top

#15 Or two negatives multiplied make a positive!
Posted by DarthVader 2008-09-08 10:32||   2008-09-08 10:32|| Front Page Top

#16 Regarding Broadhead6's post: Can anyone tell me the qualifications to be POTUS other than acquiring the age of 35 and be a natural born citizen? They are all in the eye of the voter, nowhere else. So, it is opinion that makes the man or woman qualified to be POTUS, nothing else.
Posted by Jack is Back!">Jack is Back!  2008-09-08 12:16||   2008-09-08 12:16|| Front Page Top

#17 So Sarah calls a spade a spade last week and everybody comments on her plain talk, but when A Southern Male Republican does the same he is getting pilloried...
doesn't add up to me.
You could make a case that 'since he is from the south he just HAS to be a rasict and 'uppity' is only half a word.'
Says something about your upbringings, don't it?

agre with previous posts, double standard crap has to end, and maybe that will be a side effect of Sarahcuda's explosion on the scene.
Posted by USN, Ret. 2008-09-08 14:58||   2008-09-08 14:58|| Front Page Top

#18 Uppity is uppity. I have heard this term used to describe someone who is putting on airs. Whites or blacks don't have a corner on this term. Jee whiz, this election is enough to make my head spin. The count down for the end of the silly season is on.
Posted by JohnQC 2008-09-08 19:01||   2008-09-08 19:01|| Front Page Top

#19 JFM - Wow, America is better than Europe in this situation? How comforting....(sarcasm/off)

Your populous is getting the gov'ts they deserve or will put up with. Unfortunately, so are we.

TW - there are roughly 225 million Americans of legal voting age now. Kerry got 55 million votes in '04. If Obama gets near that number - and I have no clue if he will - that's approx 25% of the entire U.S. adult pop. I know only a fraction of these voted for him in the primaries, doesn't matter, if 50 mil are willing to pull the lever to put this assclown in the white house w/a dem congress afoot - my assertion stands - a scary amount of morons.

Jack - the opinion of the voters based on what was offered from the two parties (country club rinos vs marxist dems) have given us McCain vs Obama...golf clap. The founders of the constitution were brilliant men, when they put together Article 2, Section 1 I'm not sure they foresaw a complete two party system taking hold of the gov't...or a MSM parroting crap to the people who know more about American Idol or think that since some guy can use a teleprompter - he's articulate (though he does have good teeth) then they do about the constitution that sets up the system in the first place. That's why I call it a twisted beauty pageant/popularity contest.

I do like Palin, I think she's good person & way better then the dems by a long shot. Doesn't mean I think she's the best qualified person in the U.S. to lead the country at this time.

Douglas and Lincoln used to debate for four hours.

As I said before, I hold my bile and put on my gas mask and vote for Sen Mccain.




Posted by Broadhead6 2008-09-08 20:28||   2008-09-08 20:28|| Front Page Top

#20 They are going to be reaching far and making mountains out of mole hills from here on out. It's gonna get ridiculous, they haven't even started yet. And for all the trunks out there: quit buying Sara Palin glasses frames and Palin superhero-ette dolls, that's just as creepy as the Obama-worship stuff.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-09-08 22:25||   2008-09-08 22:25|| Front Page Top

#21 Bell curve, Broadhead6 dear. Twenty-five percent being morons isn't as bad as it might be. Although yes, it is an awful lot of them. One wonders what they think of us.

Lincoln and Douglas, sadly, were an anomaly for their time. Look at the several men who held the office before and after. We must hope, as we do each election, that not only the best man won, but that he will rise to the occasion. I know that probably isn't helpful.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2008-09-08 22:25||   2008-09-08 22:25|| Front Page Top

23:52 CrazyFool
23:46 CrazyFool
23:46 JosephMendiola
23:38 Silentbrick
23:30 Silentbrick
23:28 JosephMendiola
23:20 FOTSGreg
23:12 Procopius2k
23:11 Pappy
23:10 JosephMendiola
22:55 Betty Grating2215
22:49 3dc
22:48 mhw
22:47 Barbara Skolaut
22:45 Barbara Skolaut
22:43 IG-88
22:41 3dc
22:39 3dc
22:39 ed
22:38 mojo
22:37 ed
22:33 MoreScotch4Me
22:31 3dc
22:28 bigjim-ky









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com