Article

2012-10-06 Home Front: WoT

Zbigniew: 'Crack Down' on Slanderers of the Prophet(PTUI) & Morsi is 'relatively moderate'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Flitch Omang4531 2012-10-06 07:41|| || Front Page|| [11129 views ] Top

#1 Walid Shoebat alleges the film was made by Palestinian terrorists from Bethlehem, using identity theft and financed with credit card fraud, to blame it on Coptic Christians--that is a conspiracy that makes sense. He also rightly questions why the Feds haven't prosecuted previously in decades of known crimes....

Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck 5095 2012-10-06 09:46|| 2012-10-06 09:46|| Front Page Top

#2 Carter era Eastern Euro elitist, Bilderburger, and aging oxygen thief. Probably still on the SVR payroll. Please go fishing or write a new book and leave us alone!

Posted by Besoeker 2012-10-06 10:18|| 2012-10-06 10:18|| Front Page Top

#3 The conspiracy I believe is that Al Queda realized this film trailer would upset some folks so they shopped it around at Mosques they knew they could count on to get a lot of rioters out on Sept 11 and cover their numbers and make it look as if the entire Muslim world supported the attacks.

Another conspiracy theory I believe is a President realized the attacks made his entire foreign policy look naive and dangerous so he grabbed onto any cover story that might work damn the constitution. His followers had supported nonsense in the past and they'd support this nonsense and for awhile he was right.

Posted by rjschwarz 2012-10-06 10:51|| 2012-10-06 10:51|| Front Page Top

#4 Ha! after the mess him and Jimmuh made over there that we are still living with, I wouldn't believe Zbig if he told me water was wet.

Posted by Dikhed Al Fuqwad 2012-10-06 10:53|| 2012-10-06 10:53|| Front Page Top

#5 Mika didn't fall far from the stunted tree

Posted by Frank G 2012-10-06 11:35|| 2012-10-06 11:35|| Front Page Top

#6 Too bad he won't be joining Cap'n Hook in ADX Florence.

Posted by Spot 2012-10-06 12:22|| 2012-10-06 12:22|| Front Page Top

#7 What was its intent? Just to amuse? Just to put on YouTube so people would laugh? No! Clearly to provoke violence, killings.

Class, please open up your Propaganda Made Easy handbooks and turn to the Conspiracy section. Ok, now lets begin with step one. First, you need to rhetorically question intent. You see, speculation of motives is widely considered a vulgar practice so this method can be quite disarming. Next step is to offer up a couple of non sequitur explanations. Its recommended to use illogical or even silly examples. For more information you can go to the Get to Know your Straw Man section. And finally, announce your speculation with clear conviction. Chances are good you will be able to convince a fair number of the gullible and weak minded. And remember, should anyone challenge your assertions call them racist.

Posted by DepotGuy 2012-10-06 12:38|| 2012-10-06 12:38|| Front Page Top

#8 "Brzezinski... later collaborated with Carl J. Friedrich to develop the concept of totalitarianism as a way to more accurately and powerfully characterize and criticize the Soviets in 1956."

So he worked to deliberately criticize the Soviet Union, while being fully aware of the fact that Soviet ideology doesn't condone criticism of itself and in general encourages violent suppression of dissent.

How would he have liked it if Eisenhower had taken a more explicit position to the Communist World?
We not only condemn this, but if there are evil reactionary forces like Brzezinski at work trying to provoke violence between us and you, we have the obligation to investigate and to clamp down.

According to his logic Brzezinski himself and his family should have been extradited to the Soviet Union in the 1950s.

The Soviet Union in 1956 had huge conventional forces and nuclear weapons. The West did not surrender.
The Arab-Islamic world is no military match for the West. Why would realists argue in favor of surrender?

Nuts!

Posted by Flitch Omang4531 2012-10-06 12:55|| 2012-10-06 12:55|| Front Page Top

#9 Zbiggy's one of those guys that, if you listen to him and do the exact opposite of what he said, you'll probably do okay. Carter had a lotta guys like that, including the guy he saw in the mirror every morning.

Posted by tu3031 2012-10-06 12:59|| 2012-10-06 12:59|| Front Page Top

#10 Took an upper division History course in summer of 1978. One of his books was on the reading list. Scary then, scarier now. The Professor,of course, thought he was a god, a harbinger of a new world order. He was right about that second part.

Posted by Sgt. D.T. 2012-10-06 16:05|| 2012-10-06 16:05|| Front Page Top

#11 And this is from the guy who said the Iranian Army would remain loyal to the Shah if the Ayattola came back to Teheran.

Posted by Bill Clinton 2012-10-06 17:10|| 2012-10-06 17:10|| Front Page Top

23:25 JosephMendiola
23:09 tipover
23:03 JosephMendiola
22:51 JosephMendiola
22:41 JosephMendiola
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:08 JosephMendiola
22:08 Alaska Paul
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:56 JosephMendiola
20:27 Dale
20:26 Hellfish
20:19 lotp
20:02 Dale
19:57 lotp
19:48 Procopius2k
19:37 Dale
19:17 rjschwarz
19:15 rjschwarz
17:10 Bill Clinton
17:10 SteveS
16:58 George Glaigum7976
16:53 Skidmark
16:36 Skidmark