Article

2017-10-29 Home Front: Politix

Goodbye Home Loan Interest Deduction: Home Builders Will Oppose Republican Tax Bill

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2017-10-29 11:27|| || Front Page|| [11128 views ] Top

#1 The third possibility, if they choose to make this the hill they die on, is to reduce the deduction or remove it altogether -- the Democrats in the House mostly come from those high tax states.

Posted by trailing wife 2017-10-29 11:42|| 2017-10-29 11:42|| Front Page Top

#2 It's all 'needs based.' If you're ~~privileged~~ wealthy enough to own your own home, you have no 'need' for a tax break on the home loan interest.

If you were naive enough to believe Fred Thompson and Tom Selleck's pitch on Reserve Mortgages, you surely won't mind paying taxes on loan interest.

[sarc off]

Posted by Besoeker 2017-10-29 11:53|| 2017-10-29 11:53|| Front Page Top

#3 Why should people in modest income red states subsidize the mortgages of million dollar homes in San Francisco or New York City?

"It’s a bad bill for the housing sector,"

No, its bad for the realty business' ever speculating home prices upward. Ah, poor baby. Those who can adjust by making more affordable housing won't see a slump. Which means those HGTV homes won't be what will constitute the largest selling market.

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-10-29 12:03|| 2017-10-29 12:03|| Front Page Top

#4 Instead, the bill will retain an itemized deduction for property taxes, the House Ways and Means Committee said late Saturday. That is a concession to lawmakers from high-tax states such as New York and New Jersey.

Texas doesn't have an income tax, but does have a hefty property tax. So its just not New York or New Jersey.

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-10-29 12:05|| 2017-10-29 12:05|| Front Page Top

#5 If there's no mortgage interest deduction, about half of the people who itemize deductions (on Schedule A) will no longer be able to itemize. This is what happens when tax weenies decide they have to 'pay for' tax cuts elsewhere.

Posted by 2017-10-29 12:38|| 2017-10-29 12:38|| Front Page Top

#6 That last comment was me.

Posted by Raj 2017-10-29 12:38|| 2017-10-29 12:38|| Front Page Top

#7 Simplification always works best. Interest deduction was an incentive to borrow money and make housing more affordable; however, with all these type of short term solutions that turn into status quo the market prices adjust (both on loans and home prices). The benefit to home buyers is minimal today and the cost to taxpayers not taking the deduction is unfair. Get rid of the deduction and maybe more people will payoff their mortgage.

Posted by Airandee 2017-10-29 12:45|| 2017-10-29 12:45|| Front Page Top

#8 So the roughly 100% increase in the standard deduction wouldn't offset this? (unless you're into buying starter castles or taking 60-year notes)

Schedule A also covers charitable deductions, state and local taxes paid (also on the block), employment expenses plus a couple more. Didn't pull one up to look.

Posted by Mullah Richard 2017-10-29 12:50|| 2017-10-29 12:50|| Front Page Top

#9 When you are about to go bust you increase income and/or reduce spending. These lizards arent taking a pay cut. So they will take more from the middle class.

Posted by Threatch Jeamp8135 2017-10-29 13:56|| 2017-10-29 13:56|| Front Page Top

#10 The bill also increases the standard deduction for $12K to $24K. So this only hurts people with interest and property tax in excess of $12K. That's the upper middle class, not the middle class.

We over invest in housing because of this federal subsidy. It's one reason housing costs more than it should. The same thing is true of medical costs. The primary cause of high medical costs is the deductibility of health insurance premiums for companies.

Every time the government intervenes in markets to try to "help" someone, it ends up creating distortions that hurt society overall.

The sixteenth amendment should be repealed and the federal government should go back to excise taxes and a sales tax.

Posted by Heriberto Lover of the Hatfields1923 2017-10-29 14:28|| 2017-10-29 14:28|| Front Page Top

#11 The thing that infuriates me is all this tax cut talk and not one bit of talk from Congress about decreaasing the size of the federal government. If you do not do that, it will be bankrupt and insolvent and collapse. Congress has all the authority to spend but no fiduciary responsibility. This is a recipe for disaster.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2017-10-29 14:34|| 2017-10-29 14:34|| Front Page Top

#12 I've been watching these home builder for decades now and I have zero sympathy for them. Ask them how they feel about the sub prime mortgages that are still happening even after the 2008 mortgage meltdown. Yeah, you make the mortgages painless at the outset but increasingly painful and the mortgagee gets deeper into it. But with no money down required it's no surprise that home prices skyrocket. Well, you can imagine how the home builders feel about that. They pocket the money and when the house of cards falls the taxpayers get stuck with the bailout. Housing prices fall when all those houses go into foreclosure and it's really funny then to listen to the developers and politicians. who've been screaming for decades about how we need more affordable housing, talk about how we need to get housing prices back up where they were. Two faced sons of bitches. But you know damn well the politicians will give home builders what they want because home builders give the politicians what they want.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-10-29 14:59|| 2017-10-29 14:59|| Front Page Top

#13 Avg home price in San Diego County is $590K

Posted by Frank G 2017-10-29 15:16|| 2017-10-29 15:16|| Front Page Top

#14 This was an anti-capitalist subsidy.

Good for Trump to remove this most rentier of tax-breaks for the elite.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2017-10-29 15:17|| 2017-10-29 15:17|| Front Page Top

#15 It's not quite true that removing the mortgage interest deduction only helps the upper-upper middle class and wealthy.

People who've had to remortgage modest homes in order to cover healthcare for loved ones could be hit hard with this shift. A combination of higher interest rates / having to pay mortgage payments on a house that could have been paid off earlier, plus seriously onerous medical bills, could easily exceed what a $24k standard deduction would mean for them. Net = negative impact on such families.

It's true that someone will be hit by any changes. But it's not true that this particular proposed change will only hurt mini-mansion owners.

Posted by Albemarle Dingle5877 2017-10-29 16:38|| 2017-10-29 16:38|| Front Page Top

#16 Maybe compromise and phase it out over 20 years. This tax just perverts the market.

Posted by gorb 2017-10-29 16:46|| 2017-10-29 16:46|| Front Page Top

#17 The sole long-term effect of this subsidy is to push up loan values which tends to help the bondholders of banks.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2017-10-29 17:23|| 2017-10-29 17:23|| Front Page Top

23:55 Crererong Bonaparte2013
23:23 Skidmark
23:21 Skidmark
23:19 Skidmark
23:16 Kofi Elmurong6135
22:38 Crererong Bonaparte2013
22:08 Zenobia Floger6220
22:07 746
21:52 Zenobia Floger6220
21:11 trailing wife
21:05 Cravilet Poodle5789
20:47 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:46 Procopius2k
20:09 Bright Pebbles
19:42 phil_b
19:40 phil_b
19:35 jvalentour
19:31 Bright Pebbles
19:25 SteveS
18:37 DarthVader
18:09 Black Bart Omeasing1539
17:49 Sgt. Mom
17:48 Alaska Paul
17:47 g(r)omgoru