Article

2008-10-06 Afghanistan

In Afghanistan we do what we can; in Iraq we do what we must.

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2008-10-06 02:35|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 BIGNEWSNETWORK > PALIN, BIDEN: NUCLEAR PAKISTAN AND IRAN ARE A THREAT.

ION IRAN > WORLD IS SEEING THE EMERGENCE OF NEW REGIONAL POWERS + IRAN WILL NOT STOP URANIUM ENRICHMENT FOR FOREIGN FUEL SUPPLY [even iff guaranteed] + IRAN DOES NOT TRUST WEST FOR NUCLEAR COOPERATION + IRAN IS NOW SELF-SUFFICIENT IN MISSLES.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-10-06 03:26|| 2008-10-06 03:26|| Front Page Top

#2 shocked by a series of spectacular insurgent attacks

I'm American, and not shocked; nor would I call the attacks spectacular.

greater danger...growing despair among average Afghans that their government is fundamentally illegitimate.

Agree. By all accounts the government is corrupt and not very effectual. In other words, like every other Afghan government ever. The British couldn't fix it even at the height of their empire-building; the Russians couldn't fix it even with their casual regard for human life; how are we going to do it? We can't 'buy' success like in Iraq; we can't logistically support the force we would need to secure success the way did in South Korea or Germany; we don't have the national will to win the way we did in Japan; what's left? I suspect we should have declared 'victory' and left some time ago - and left some Special Ops units and Predators to continue the hunt for bin Laden et al.

Posted by Glenmore 2008-10-06 08:12|| 2008-10-06 08:12|| Front Page Top

#3 Agree Glenmore. More should study the Russian and British experiences and explain why we will be successful. A disaster looms. What would Bambi do if there were massacres of unsupplied US troops?

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-10-06 09:47|| 2008-10-06 09:47|| Front Page Top

#4 Afghan unity is an illusion. From the beginning we should have supported the Tadjiks, Uzbeks, Hazaras for sustained old style campaigns against the Pushtun bigots. Let the world know that those who attack, or support the attack against, the United States will die in horrible ways and their lands resettled by their enemies.

Posted by ed 2008-10-06 10:27|| 2008-10-06 10:27|| Front Page Top

#5 The first thing we should have done is imposed a MacArthur constitution on Afghanistan. We made the damned fool mistake of trying to preserve what has been *proven* to be a failed system of government.

The rule would have from the onset been created with the idea that it could not be changed for at least 20 years. The entire government would have been sent to school to learn how to govern, then apprenticed to western bureaucrats to learn how to do it in practice.

Very strict rules, any violation of which results in being fired. Totally disregard any social status not based in meritocracy.

Add to this mandatory western style public schools for all children, and a public works project for all unemployed males--which is possible because of their ridiculously low standard wage.

Within a few years, all citizens of Afghanistan are intentionally made *different* from their neighbors in other countries. The more different they can be made, the more difficult it is for negative interface between the two.

Posted by Anonymoose 2008-10-06 11:43|| 2008-10-06 11:43|| Front Page Top

#6 More should study the Russian and British experiences and explain why we will be successful.

Because we can study our own experience on the Mexican border 1860-90 and see how we succeeded. Somehow it worked didn't it? Put enough pressure on those raiders and suddenly they find it easier to do their work back on the other side of the border, making the host government unstable and forcing action. And don't try to sell a bill of goods that the Territorial government let alone those in Washington weren't awash in corruption either at the time.

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-10-06 11:49|| 2008-10-06 11:49|| Front Page Top

#7 Somehow I suspect our lines of communication with the Mexican border were more secure than our lines of communication in Afghanistan.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-10-06 11:59|| 2008-10-06 11:59|| Front Page Top

#8 NS, our lines of communication in Afghanistan are just fine (and way better than Mexico 100 years ago); I think you mean our lines of supply, and that would be quite true.

Posted by Glenmore 2008-10-06 12:48|| 2008-10-06 12:48|| Front Page Top

#9 What Procopius said.

Posted by lotp 2008-10-06 13:13|| 2008-10-06 13:13|| Front Page Top

#10 We need 8 more years of Bush genius. We can only get that if Senator John McCain is elected President.

EIGHT MORE YEARS; BUSH LEADS, McCAIN FOLLOWS

Posted by Bush-Man 2008-10-06 14:59|| 2008-10-06 14:59|| Front Page Top

#11 I suppose you think you're a sarcastic democrat making a clever argument.

Posted by Tranquil Mechanical Yeti 2008-10-06 15:08|| 2008-10-06 15:08|| Front Page Top

#12 "Ayers/Dohrn in '12" is what it is really trying to say, TMY.

Amazing how witty and clever these libtards think their transparent lies are; fooling the primitive masses, all that. I think it comes from deriving their entire worldview, their entire personalities even, from stand-up comedy and the media sound-bite world.

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2008-10-06 17:12|| 2008-10-06 17:12|| Front Page Top

#13 Enough of this defeatism and handwringing.

It is quite possible to create an Afghan government that will keep international terrorists from using the country as a base. That is the objective here, not to Christianize, civilize, or consumerize the Afghan hillbillies. At one time, Afghanistan did in fact have a national government that could do that. It was a monarchy and it was quite successful in keeping tribal "disturbances" within reasonable bounds from about 1920 until communist meddling led to its overthrow in the 70s. The last king, Mohammed Zahir Shah, returned from exile in 2002 and died just last year.

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2008-10-06 17:22|| 2008-10-06 17:22|| Front Page Top

23:25 GK
23:07 Thurong Mussolini2697
22:58 Barbara Skolaut
22:50 Jolutch Mussolini7800
22:44 Old Patriot
22:37 Yosemite Sam
22:28 crosspatch
22:25 Procopius2k
22:21 Besoeker
22:18 Tranquil Mechanical Yeti
22:10 Scribimus indocti
22:07 Spanky Spinetch9985
22:07 Spanky Spinetch9985
22:07 Besoeker
22:06 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
22:02 lotp
21:58 Scribimus indocti
21:56 Zhang Fei
21:50 Besoeker
21:49 lotp
21:46 Besoeker
21:44 Chemist
21:44 Besoeker
21:42 lotp