Article

2011-12-12 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Iran to practice closing oil hub Strait of Hormuz

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by 2011-12-12 11:19|| || Front Page|| [11138 views ] Top

#1 That should be an interesting exercise to watch. Do they need someone to play OPFOR or will they just ignore that part of the game?

Posted by SteveS 2011-12-12 13:24|| 2011-12-12 13:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Good time for our ships to practice sinking Iranian ships...

Posted by Steve White 2011-12-12 13:29|| 2011-12-12 13:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Iran has a small navy. Sinking it would most likely be the outcome of closing the Straits.

Posted by JohnQC 2011-12-12 13:48|| 2011-12-12 13:48|| Front Page Top

#4 That's what happened last time.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2011-12-12 13:56|| 2011-12-12 13:56|| Front Page Top

#5 Park'em next to the Iran Ajr.

Posted by swksvolFF 2011-12-12 15:14|| 2011-12-12 15:14|| Front Page Top

#6 Someone tell Greenpiece that Iran is hunting whales in the Strait of Hormuz.

Posted by gorb 2011-12-12 17:36|| 2011-12-12 17:36|| Front Page Top

#7 More likely it'll be small attack craft, minisubs, mine laying (farther up the straits) and other non-conventional warfare tactics.

It'll be... interesting... to see what happens.

Posted by Pappy 2011-12-12 17:54|| 2011-12-12 17:54|| Front Page Top

#8 I'm hoping that we are watching them closely.

Posted by CrazyFool 2011-12-12 17:55|| 2011-12-12 17:55|| Front Page Top

#9 China has begun deploying "dual-use" giant drilling platforms = rigs in the SCS capable of being quickly armed wid LR RECCE + TACMISSLE SYS, fka in Euro during WW2 as "SEA/CHANNEL FORTS".

Dare Iran in the PG be as serious as China in the SCS???

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-12-12 18:53|| 2011-12-12 18:53|| Front Page Top

#10 This remains one of my favorite video clips of all time: http://www.navybook.com/nohigherhonor/vid-prayingmantis.shtml, at 2:12 into the clip.

Posted by Lone Ranger 2011-12-12 19:26|| 2011-12-12 19:26|| Front Page Top

#11 HMMMM, HMMMM, lessiree, BHARAT RAKSHAK > [Gilani] PAKISTAN TO SUSTAIN NATO CONVOY BAN.

ARTIC > GILANI = CLOSURE OF ALL PAK AIRSPACE TO US FLIGHTS NOT RULED OUT.

plus

* SAME/TOPIX > RUSSIA: NO FINAL DECISION TO CLOSE AFGHAN SUPPLY ROUTES [Russia-Stans-Afghanistan].

* BHARAT RALSHAK > {Eurasianet.org] AFGHANISTAN: THE PRESSURE IS NOW ON CENTRAL ASIA SUPPLY ROUTES.

ARTIC = indics that, outside of Central Asia land routes, it costs the USAF approxi US$14,000 per tonne to airlift supplies into Afghanistan, OVERLAND SUPPLY ROUTES ARE LONGER + TIME-CONSUMING, BUT ALSO FAR CHEAPER.

IOW, Russia + by extens CAR [Central Asia Region] Routes are still a QUESTION MARK AS RUSSIA WON'T CONFIRM OR DENY THAT IT WILL CLOSE THE ROUTES.

* SAME/TOPIX > ROGOZIN: CENTRAL ASIA STANS NEXT TARGET FOR ISLAMISTS AFTER NATO AFGHAN DEFEAT.

ARTIC > ROGOZIN = TARGET:STANS [Ex-SSRS] also read, NUCLEAR MAMA RUSSIA PER SE.

In sum, IMO any de facto Iran-led closure of the Straits of Hormuz only makes the Overland = Russia + CAR Routes more important to the US-NATO efforts in Afghanistan be it pre-2014 or post-2014. Also read, BAD FOR THE UNDER-THREAT-OF-NEW-RECESSION-OR-DEPRESSION-IN-2012 USA.

The reasons for US-led WAR AGZ IRAN, WID OR WIDOUT ISRAEL, JUST KEEPS PILING UP.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-12-12 21:44|| 2011-12-12 21:44|| Front Page Top

23:38 DarthVader
22:29 Thineper Ebbutle4977
22:08 JosephMendiola
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:44 JosephMendiola
21:24 Frank G
21:21 crosspatch
21:19 JosephMendiola
21:09 crosspatch
20:48 Goober McCoy9315
20:46 badanov
20:30 tipper
20:27 trailing wife
20:15 Secret Asian Man
19:49 Pollyandrew
19:45 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:34 Frank G
19:32 Frank G
19:31 Pappy
19:31 gorb
19:26 Lone Ranger
19:18 Lone Ranger
19:11 Slatle Bumble5851
19:10 crosspatch