Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/22/2003 View Wed 05/21/2003 View Tue 05/20/2003 View Mon 05/19/2003 View Sun 05/18/2003 View Sat 05/17/2003 View Fri 05/16/2003
1
2003-05-22 Iraq
Witness sez Sammy & Sons, Inc. left before bombs landed on Mansour
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2003-05-22 10:59 am|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 A couple of points:

Salam Pax commented early in the war about how normal Baghdad was despite the bombing, citing as an example that the Al Saa restaurant remained open. This is the restaurant in the Mansour disctrict where Sammy and Sons were supposed to have been targeted (follow the link in Fred's post to see the Al Saa reference). This is proof to me that he is a child of considerable privilege and has strong Baath connections even if he was not exactly pro-Saddam.

Second, the Batchelor & Alexander radio show on WABC Radio in NYC at 10 p.m. Eastern (WABCRadio.com) has a regular guest (at 10:35 every evening) named John Loftus (john-loftus.com), a former intelligence officer and Nazi- and Sami Al-Arian-hunting lawyer, who has been reporting since March 20th that his intellignce contacts told him that we got Sammy & Sons in the initial decapitation strike. He tells the story in amazing detail, and has lots of other interesting, Debka-style information about shenanigans involving S. Arabia, Syria, Iraq, Russia, N. Korea, France, Libya, China and Iran. It's worth listening, because if half of what Loftus says is true, there's a lot of things that are not being reported in the mainstream media.

Posted by Tibor 2003-05-22 11:31:29||   2003-05-22 11:31:29|| Front Page Top

#2 Salam also reported this bombing occurred "the next street over" from his house.
Posted by Chuck  2003-05-22 12:52:26|| [blog.simmins.org]  2003-05-22 12:52:26|| Front Page Top

#3 Didn't the New Yorker article covering the 7th also say that it wasn't the restaurant that was hit but several houses near there? I think I have read that two places but I can't remember where. Does that mean we didn't hit the target (whether or not they were there)? Also, Tibor, thanks for the info.
Posted by Sharon 2003-05-22 15:49:25||   2003-05-22 15:49:25|| Front Page Top

#4 Didn't the New Yorker article covering the 7th also say that it wasn't the restaurant that was hit but several houses near there?

The BBC ran a report the day after with the correspondent standing outside the intact Al Saa restaurant.

I have not seen a satisfactory explaination of what happened. Did the bombs hit the wrong place or was the wrong restuarant named?
Posted by Phil B  2003-05-22 19:53:57||   2003-05-22 19:53:57|| Front Page Top

#5 There was an Australian journalist that went to the location that found the hotel pretty much undamaged, but a couple houses next to it had been destroyed. So the bombs probably missed
Posted by Paul Moloney 2003-05-22 21:09:47||   2003-05-22 21:09:47|| Front Page Top

11:47 Lucky
11:36 Lucky
11:16 Lucky
10:58 Lucky
10:54 Lucky
01:16 Steve White
23:50 Watcher
23:37 Watcher
22:17 Mark IV
21:56 debbie
21:19 Paul Moloney
21:09 Paul Moloney
20:59 Bomb-a-rama
20:52 Frank G
20:49 Frank G
20:43 Ernest Brown
20:43 Ptah
20:27 Michael
20:26 Anonymous
20:26 Old Patriot
20:13 Old Patriot
20:03 badanov
19:59 Alaska Paul
19:53 Phil B









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com