Article

2003-11-23 Terror Networks

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2003-11-23 1:01:44 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 We have taken out a bunch of the qaeda terrorists, but the beast will only re-grow its arms, unless we slaughter it at the head in Saudi Arabia.

Posted by ISLAM SUCKS 2003-11-23 1:34:17 AM|| 2003-11-23 1:34:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Here we go again: angry Muslims. The truth is that they are angry because they are teached they deserve to be the overlords of the world allowed to kill, enslave and rape the ~~untermensch~~ kaffirs like they do in Sudan. Instead they see is the insignificance of the Muslim countries, thus the anger. But the answer to terrorism is destroy this teaching who is financed by teh wahabis of Saudi Arabia.

Posted by JFM 2003-11-23 3:40:03 AM|| 2003-11-23 3:40:03 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 How you know that this is propaganda
The Tell:
The men are joining groups inspired by the occupation of Iraq

And.... another bogus statement that anyone who knows anything about leadership recognizes as untrue:
"There are fewer leaders but more followers."

The greatest lie contain a truth. The truth in this article is the opening line:
The recent surge in terrorist strikes on "soft targets" like consulates, banks and synagogues in places like Turkey and Saudi Arabia is worrying, but paradoxically reflects progress by the United States and Europe in disrupting Al Qaeda, especially its leadership structure Ah..true, true.

Oh..but wait...

THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING!

Why? "The killing and capturing of Al Qaeda leaders is failing... to keep pace with the number of angry young Muslim men and women willing to participate in suicide attacks. "

So, I guess we should all just pack up our bags and go home since the more sucessful we are wiping out AQ, the worse off we will be in the long run. Right?

Posted by B 2003-11-23 6:52:58 AM|| 2003-11-23 6:52:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 I still think that the Istanbul attacks were coordinated with the attack on Talibani's house to make a point. Both happened while? Talibani was in Turkey to talk about economic alliances between Iraq and Turkey. If Short or the British Consulate were facilitating those talks then I think AQ went out of their way to intimidate anyone even thinking of getting these two countries to form a sucessful democratic block in the ME

Posted by B 2003-11-23 2:36:06 PM|| 2003-11-23 2:36:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Nice one B. So follow the money and you have what? Iraqi oil/Turkey cooperatiion means center of power in that camp, money wise. Which would lead me to the AQ/SA connection. Or Iran as they want that slice of the pie and the center of power moves there.

Turkey, the fly in the ointment, must really bug both those camps. It would be to Irans favor to keep Kurdish/Turkey hostile to one another. And AQ/SA and their cousin Syria would still want to control the ME oil flow.

Posted by Lucky 2003-11-23 7:40:18 PM|| 2003-11-23 7:40:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Maybe we should just kill all first-born sons?

Nah - too Jewish...

Posted by mojo 2003-11-23 8:35:32 PM|| 2003-11-23 8:35:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 killing first born sons?

no, too godlike. They jews did not do the act, god did. Keep your bible straight.

Posted by capt joe 2003-11-23 10:52:20 PM|| 2003-11-23 10:52:20 PM|| Front Page Top

08:07 B
04:34 Atomic Conspiracy
01:58 Atomic Conspiracy
00:18 Lizzel
00:16 LeftEnd
00:10 LeftEnd
23:55 LeftEnd
23:54 NotMikeMoore
23:51 Rafael
23:35 NotMikeMoore
23:24 NotMikeMoore
23:20 NotMikeMoore
23:13 NotMikeMoore
22:52 capt joe
22:48 capt joe
22:45 capt joe
22:45 rkb
22:33 Chuck
21:41 BOBB
21:33 J
21:26 Charles
21:17 ruprecht
21:12 ruprecht
21:06 ruprecht