Article

2003-11-25 Iraq

This is Curious: Hezbollah shuns U.S. targets in Iraq

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dragon Fly 2003-11-25 8:32:31 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I 'spect they're taking notes.

Posted by John 2003-11-25 9:08:51 AM|| 2003-11-25 9:08:51 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Why risk getting shot up by M16s, M60s, M1A2s, and AH-64s when there are so many helpless soft targets around?

Posted by Dar 2003-11-25 9:27:41 AM|| 2003-11-25 9:27:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Getting their boys in place in preparation for the handover?

Posted by BH 2003-11-25 9:32:22 AM|| 2003-11-25 9:32:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 They don't want us to have a casus belli before their nukes are finished.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2003-11-25 9:34:42 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2003-11-25 9:34:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Whack'em

Posted by Raptor 2003-11-25 9:46:20 AM|| 2003-11-25 9:46:20 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 1. Irans hopes for control in Iraq are premised on support from the Shia community. The Shia community wants peace, and largely accepts the US presence. Even Al-sadr has made positive noises lately. For Iran or Hezbollah to take violent action against the US now would be to alienate the Iraqi Shia, and endanger Al-Sadrs position.
2. If they see the US cutting and running due to Baathist attacks, its to their advantage to wait and come in then,
3. They want very much to avoid sanctions over their nuke program - why give the US more rationale to present to the more sane Euros (IE the Brits)
4. Theyre divided and vulnerable interally - an incautious policy could be taken advantage of by internal dissidents
5. Theyve been cautious with the US whenever the US looked scary. IE over Afghanistan, etc.
6. Some rumors that Hezbollah is trying to do some kind of larger strategic deal with Israel - with the prisoner swap being the first step.

Posted by liberalhawk 2003-11-25 9:50:59 AM|| 2003-11-25 9:50:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 If you're Shi'a, and the "volunteers" jumping up and down screaming "pick me! pick me!" are a mix of Shi'a & Sunni -- who are you going to pick?

Posted by snellenr 2003-11-25 10:35:55 AM|| 2003-11-25 10:35:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 I would suspect that we haven't attacked either Iran or Syria because they aren't actively backing foreign terrorist groups against us. That will change if either country takes that route.

Note that even if they're actively trying to prevent people from coming over the border, people will still get through. The weak links are the border guards, who can be bribed, or may be sympathetic to the cause the terrrorists represent. That Iran, for one, does not have complete control over its borders is illustrated by frequent reports of drug-related gun-battles involving dozens of men when the Taliban were in power. Drugs are readily available in Iran, despite drug importation and trafficking being capital offenses.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2003-11-25 11:27:57 AM|| 2003-11-25 11:27:57 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Lebanese terrorist groups are not all that effective. The sniping, land mines, IED's, etc. caused a few dozen Israeli KIA annually, while Israeli forces were in South Lebanon.

What really hurt the Israelis was the impression the Palestinians obtained from its withdrawal - that Israel would also withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza if the Palestinians could inflict a few dozen casualties annually on Israel. In a way, withdrawing from South Lebanon gave comfort to Palestinian terrorists in the same way that the US withdrawal from Somalia after 19 KIA gave comfort to al Qaeda. (Unfortunately, Republican opposition to the completion of the Somalia mission was complicit in conveying the impression of American weakness).

Posted by Zhang Fei 2003-11-25 11:35:38 AM|| 2003-11-25 11:35:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Just waiting for us to leave. They're hoping that we leave Iraq sooner rather than later and in worse shape than I believe we will. Then they can move in and gain influence.

They are going to find that by the time we leave Iraqis will have no patience for their jihad mentality and Iraq will be well on it's way to prosperity.

Posted by Damn_Proud_American 2003-11-25 11:59:58 AM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com] 2003-11-25 11:59:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Just waiting for us to leave.

I don't see our guys leaving for decades. At minimum, I see two divisions in Iraq, but out in the desert, just like in Afghanistan, where it's a lot more difficult to use IED's and mines against us. The reason we're taking casualties is because we're hanging around cities - no clear fields of fire out there. City combat isn't inherently tough - when you're taking down entire buildings around the defenders, as we did during the major combat phase. When you're tiptoeing around the civilian inhabitants, as we're doing now, we fail to catch the perps and in many cases, take casualties.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2003-11-25 12:23:06 PM|| 2003-11-25 12:23:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 One base in the Kurdish north, rumor has it a big "listening post" has already been built there. Keep a eye on Iran and Syria from there as well as defend Turkey from Kurdish incursions (and visa versa). Also the big airbase down south as a replacement for the Saudi bases. Cover Iran, the Gulf States, and Saudi from there.

Posted by Steve 2003-11-25 2:37:13 PM|| 2003-11-25 2:37:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 They view the US as willing to take losses and stay as long as it takes. The europeans are not seen to be as committed, and Iran would like to separate us from our allies.

The appropriate response would be to better integrate our C&C with the european forces, and hit back with particular aggressiveness when they are struck.

Posted by flash91 2003-11-25 6:28:50 PM|| 2003-11-25 6:28:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 I think its fairly obvious what Hezbollah is doing in Iraq. Training the 'recruits' how to fight and doubling as sleeper cells.

Posted by Charles 2003-11-25 6:43:47 PM|| 2003-11-25 6:43:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 Could they be setting themselves up simular to how Hmas is burried in the Palestinian community? I would think that funds for their outreach programs would dry up if Syria and/or Iran is destabilized.

Posted by Super Hose 2003-11-25 8:50:39 PM|| 2003-11-25 8:50:39 PM|| Front Page Top

00:21 Peaceandfreedom
13:38 Anonymous3965
04:49 Super Hose
01:41 Jeff
01:36 Jeff
23:47 Bomb-a-rama
23:35 Anonymous
23:18 Gasse Katze
23:05 Old Patriot
23:02 Sherry
22:59 BH
22:55 Old Patriot
22:51 badanov
22:22 Robert Crawford
22:07 john
21:42 Jarhead
21:40 commo
21:37 Cheddarhead
21:30 Aris Katsaris
21:23 Jarhead
21:18 Jarhead
21:17 CrazyFool
21:15 commo
21:14 john