Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 01/13/2004 View Mon 01/12/2004 View Sun 01/11/2004 View Sat 01/10/2004 View Fri 01/09/2004 View Thu 01/08/2004 View Wed 01/07/2004
1
2004-01-13 Home Front
Richard Perle notes ‘big problems’ with Saudi Arabia and Syria
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2004-01-13 00:51|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Didn't we also have “big problems” with Iraq and Afganistan?
Posted by ed 2004-1-13 12:58:07 AM||   2004-1-13 12:58:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 That's the thing about these two bit tyrants like Assad, Noriega, etc., etc. They are like little yappy dogs. Most of the big dogs run off with their tails tucked, when they rush forward snapping and snarling. The problem for yappy dogs is that they are in a really bad position when the big dog decides to snarl and snap back.

We've snarled - he's been warned we're going to snap. I'm guessing he's just going to keep annoying us until we do.
Posted by B 2004-1-13 8:20:25 AM||   2004-1-13 8:20:25 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Wonder if the rotation through Incirlik rather than Kuwait is meant to put additional pressure on Syria?
Posted by Sharon in NYC 2004-1-13 9:23:34 AM||   2004-1-13 9:23:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 So what do we have here ?
1. Iraq has made it through the hardest part and will clearly continue to improve.
2. Time to lay out the strategies for the next phase. Any volunteers ? Syria ? Is that you in the back ? Come on up to the front of the class.
Posted by Anonymous 2004-1-13 11:40:30 AM||   2004-1-13 11:40:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Only in the US media could obvious statements be portrayed as 'controversial.'
Posted by Super Hose  2004-1-13 11:56:51 AM||   2004-1-13 11:56:51 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 I still fault Rumsfeld for not already working to strengthen the US Military. We need at LEAST two more divisions of Army and another brigade-size unit or two in the Marines. We need at LEAST another Air wing or two, and probably two additional Navy carrier air groups. We need to double the size of the National Guard and Reserve forces, at least on paper, with the goal in mind of filling all those slots within ten years or so.

Unfortunately, it takes from one to two years to recruit, equip, supply, and train a new division. We needed to have started on 9/11/01. If we had, we'd have at least two additional divisions we could rotate through Iraq NOW, gaining experience in fighting Arab military and para-military forces. We'd have the manpower and equipment to push simultaneously through Syria and Iran, before needing to stop and regroup, rearm, and rest before heading further east, west, and south.

The War on Terrorism is going to be long, bloody, and difficult. We need adequate manpower to do it right. The sooner we start the military buildup, the better.
Posted by Old Patriot  2004-1-13 7:58:03 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm]  2004-1-13 7:58:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Jeez OP. I'll go for the 2 Army divsion... but another Marine Brigade (or two)? Operation Olympic was cancelled in 1946 :>

Frankly my theory is that Iraq is about the largest country that can be dealt with by conventional US forces... anything less (SA) we're good to go... anthing larger (IRAN) we're good to go.... using all available means.
Posted by Shipman 2004-1-13 9:20:20 PM||   2004-1-13 9:20:20 PM|| Front Page Top

16:28 raptor
10:26 Daniel King
03:24 The Dodo
03:08 Faisal
00:51 Old Patriot
23:56 Atomic Conspiracy
23:24 Korora
23:17 tu3031
23:00 Lu Baihu
22:56 Pappy
22:46 Pappy
22:45 Frank G
22:34 Pappy
22:33 tu3031
22:26 Pappy
22:26 Tom
22:22 Tom
22:17 ruprecht
22:15 Super Hose
22:14 Laurence of the Rats
22:10 Pappy
22:04 ruprecht
22:00 Atomic Conspiracy
22:00 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com