Article

2004-04-06 Home Front: WoT

A NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY FOR A GLOBAL AGE

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by GK 2004-04-06 8:56:56 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I was tipped off to this on the radio so I checked up on it. Did a word search on each of the major sections. 'Bin Ladin' appears about 4 or 5 times. 'Al Qaeda' does not appear at all. This is out of a document containing roughly 45,000 words and is supposed to lay out our global anti-terror strategy, which just goes to show that:

1) Clinton had no interest in going after Al Qaeda
2) Clarke has perjured himself in the grand Clinton tradition.

I'm just wondering when this will make it into the line of questioning at the 9/11 hearings....anyone? Buehler?

Posted by Rex Mundi 2004-04-06 12:36:01 PM|| 2004-04-06 12:36:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Elsewhere I saw an early appearance of the talking point defense: they used the word urgent, so that means it's OK.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-04-06 12:42:03 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2004-04-06 12:42:03 PM|| Front Page Top

00:05 Zenster
22:28 Zenster
20:24 Zenster
19:19 Zenster
17:36 Zenster
17:07 Zenster
12:09 Anonymous4052
10:35 B
10:31 Raptor
10:29 B
10:24 Raptor
09:32 muck4doo
04:15 Super Hose
04:10 Super Hose
03:41 ed
02:19 ex-lib
02:12 Sherry
01:26 .com
01:01 Not Mike Moore
00:57 Rafael
00:46 .com
00:40 Super Hose
00:33 Super Hose
00:32 GKarp