Article

2004-04-21 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2004-04-21 4:29:46 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Like a lot of people I responded to the neolithic behaivor in Fajullah by saying "just nuke the motherf*****s". Then more sane and rational thoughts set in. The djini is out of the bottle as far as nukes are concerned, they can't be uninvented. But that does not we sould be reduced to responding with just city busters if it ever came to that (although we do need to keep some of those too, I can think of a couple of targets off the top of my head). In the WoT the main problem is the enemy is so easily hid. Any government that supports terroists today is going to do everything it can to stay out of the crosshairs. I like the idea of converting the MX peacekeepers to conventional warheads, but even thirty minutes might not be enough lead time for a really high value target

Posted by cheaderhead 2004-04-21 6:20:55 AM|| 2004-04-21 6:20:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 It's not that I dislike the idea of a Nuclear Exchange, it's just that Armageddon need's a better PR firm. Sell it to me.

Posted by Shipman 2004-04-21 9:18:22 PM|| 2004-04-21 9:18:22 PM|| Front Page Top

10:19 Yosemite Sam
06:19 Howard UK
06:12 .com
04:46 Neo
04:34 Super Hose
04:21 Super Hose
04:17 Howard UK
04:16 Super Hose
04:14 Super Hose
04:10 Howard UK
03:10 Super Hose
02:58 Super Hose
02:53 Super Hose
02:52 Super Hose
02:51 Zenster
02:47 Super Hose
02:44 Super Hose
23:57 Halfass Pete
23:51 Carl in N.H.
23:46 Mike Sylwester
23:41 ColoradoConservative
23:38 Mike Sylwester
23:35 Gromky
23:32 Gromky