Article

2004-09-01 Great White North

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2004-09-01 12:32:05 AM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Look for our Supreme Court to use the Canadian Court to back up Social Engineering projects to follow.

Posted by Super Hose 2004-09-01 12:48:55 AM|| 2004-09-01 12:48:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Her views on anal intercourse alone -- and they are extensive -- would have been worth exploring.

Man, just exactly are they? That bad eh?

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-09-01 3:25:01 AM|| 2004-09-01 3:25:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 SPoD -- Intrigued by this bizarre reference, I googled the judge and found out about the case. She upheld a lower court ruling that lowered the age of consent for anal sex to 14 (to match that of regular sex) because the law discriminated against gay teens. The decision arose out of a case where a 23-year old guy was having "consensual" anal sex with a 13-year old girl (who would later become his niece, I think). Amazingly, the case was supported by some lefty "children's rights" advocates in Canada! Why don't we just send a girl scout troop or two up there to accomplish regime change?

Posted by Tibor 2004-09-01 12:44:19 PM|| 2004-09-01 12:44:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Hey! Sharia not looking so bad now is it?

Posted by Shipman 2004-09-01 5:49:14 PM|| 2004-09-01 5:49:14 PM|| Front Page Top

21:54 Anonymous6412
16:15 lex
08:58 Phil Fraering
03:22 Sock Puppet of Doom
03:04 tibor
02:03 Asedwich
01:11 Old Patriot
01:04 Anonymous5032
00:25 Mike Sylwester
00:23 .com
00:07 .com
00:03 Dar
00:00 Classical_Liberal
23:53 muck4doo
23:49 OldSpook
23:45 OldSpook
23:42 Brett_the_Quarkian
23:41 .com
23:40 muck4doo
23:39 .com
23:38 anymouse
23:38 Brett_the_Quarkian
23:32 Brett_the_Quarkian
23:29 jn1