Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 09/20/2004 View Sun 09/19/2004 View Sat 09/18/2004 View Fri 09/17/2004 View Thu 09/16/2004 View Wed 09/15/2004 View Tue 09/14/2004
1
2004-09-20 Home Front: Politix
Bush, Kerry Tentatively Settle on 3 Debates
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2004-09-20 12:03:37 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Why debate? Keerys a loser. Thats not even debateable. He has made a deal with the devil for a silver tongue so why debate him.

Let him choke and pay for his publicity. I would rather step on a dog turd than listen to Kerry.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-09-20 6:48:29 AM||   2004-09-20 6:48:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Rumor has it that the debates were agreed to because Rove knows that Kerry had such an unlikable personality that the more one sees of him the more one is turned off.
Posted by BigEd 2004-09-20 7:10:14 AM||   2004-09-20 7:10:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Before these three, Kerry should hold a self debate where he debates his own positions on the various issues. Whichever positions win will be the positions he sticks with . . . until the first debate.
Posted by Tibor 2004-09-20 4:02:55 PM||   2004-09-20 4:02:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Drudge has a report that the Bush campaign wants the CBS guy off because of rathergate. I also read yesterday that Kerry is going to take "acting" lessions so that he'll be more likable.
Posted by AF Lady 2004-09-20 8:41:22 PM||   2004-09-20 8:41:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Hopefully, Kerry's performance might be so off-putting as to be vote-surpressing. For fun I am coming up with a list of no-win questions that could make Kerry squirm. For example:

Is our policy with repsect to Israel/Palestine even-handed or should it be made more consistent with the policy prevalent in the EU and UN?
Posted by Super Hose 2004-09-20 10:34:46 PM||   2004-09-20 10:34:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 How about:
"Given the proven corruption and dictator-loving-culture at the UN, specifically the Oil-For-Palaces program, why do you think the UN would do better given a veto over American security?"
Posted by Frank G  2004-09-20 10:47:37 PM||   2004-09-20 10:47:37 PM|| Front Page Top

13:48 Fred
13:46 Fred
12:14 Anonymous6563
12:14 Anonymous6563
02:55 Anonymous6560
02:55 Anonymous6560
01:22 Anonymous6558
01:22 Anonymous6558
00:38 Anonymous6556
00:38 Anonymous6556
19:23 Today
01:49 Anonymous6590
15:45 Aris Katsaris
15:39 Aris Katsaris
10:10 Sock Puppet of Doom
09:53 Bulldog
09:20 RN
08:57 TS(vice girl)
08:54 Aris Katsaris
08:20 2B
06:13 Sock Puppet of Doom
06:04 Howard UK
05:10 Bulldog
03:38 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com