Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/28/2004 View Wed 10/27/2004 View Tue 10/26/2004 View Mon 10/25/2004 View Sun 10/24/2004 View Sat 10/23/2004 View Fri 10/22/2004
1
2004-10-28 -Short Attention Span Theater-
D'oh! O'Reilly Sex Case Settled
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Frank G 2004-10-28 7:14:32 PM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Best possible scenario for all. She gete money, Bill keeps his job, and his rating SOAR. Look for some 'Adult' section at www.billorielly.com!
Posted by Cyber Sarge  2004-10-28 7:41:26 PM||   2004-10-28 7:41:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Insurance rates go up, lawyers get exorbitant fees no longer characterized as extortion, insurance company gets tapes, and O'Reilly keeps sleeping in the guest room.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-10-28 7:46:56 PM||   2004-10-28 7:46:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 so much for NO SPIN...
Posted by borgboy 2004-10-28 8:28:43 PM||   2004-10-28 8:28:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 She gete money

We don't even know if Ms Mackris got any money! For all we know, she felt the heat and took the easy way out by offering to drop her case if O'Reilly dropped his. She had Feds investigating her and the $60 million dollar extortation issue. She could have done this to save her own skin.

It's also possible "others" were afraid of being connected to Ms Mackris and told her to give it up. Need more details than "Settled". And the key that makes me think this was extortion is that the article states that Mrs Mackris counsel had no wrongdoing. How does the counsel get exempt from wrongdoing if the were working a legitimate case?
Posted by Charles  2004-10-28 10:02:15 PM||   2004-10-28 10:02:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 This stinks - if she had tapes he was sunk. Either she and her atty tried to extort money (with O'Reilly guilty of despicable behavior for a married man)
or
she had no proof, tries to get $ and the extortion suit by O'Reilly calls the bluff of the "lady" and her atty.

The fact she returned to work for him and was deep in debt skews the odds....
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-28 10:13:14 PM||   2004-10-28 10:13:14 PM|| Front Page Top

23:28 Glereger Cligum6229
15:33 Frank G
15:32 Liberalhawk
06:55 Shipman
06:51 Mark Z.
04:16 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
04:01 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:48 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:43 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:42 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:41 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:39 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:36 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
03:33 Grumpy Uncle Sam TROLL
00:11 Steve White
00:11 Zenster
23:39 Barbara Skolaut
23:35 Barbara Skolaut
23:35 Long Hair Republican
23:30 Capt America
23:30 Capt America
23:29 Frank G
23:14 Frank G
23:11 Phil Fraering









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com