Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 11/11/2004 View Wed 11/10/2004 View Tue 11/09/2004 View Mon 11/08/2004 View Sun 11/07/2004 View Sat 11/06/2004 View Fri 11/05/2004
1
2004-11-11 China-Japan-Koreas
China denies knowledge of suspect submarine in Japan waters
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-11-11 4:25:27 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 aaaah denial , the first step towards acceptance ;)
Posted by MacNails 2004-11-11 5:52:35 AM||   2004-11-11 5:52:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Submarine? We ain't got no stinkin' submarine. (Somebody had to do it) If this is a Chinese nuclear boat just how is it navigating? Curb Feelers?
Posted by Cheaderhead 2004-11-11 6:05:30 AM||   2004-11-11 6:05:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 The same way all submarines navigate . . . dead reckoning and sonar. Sonar keeps them away from all the big stuff under water and they simply keep an eye on their speed and direction while submerged. Once they surface they can use their illegally acquired GPS . . . er . . . sextant to determine their position.
Posted by Jame Retief  2004-11-11 6:44:50 AM||   2004-11-11 6:44:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 So its not your submarine?

Then you won't mind if we sink it then...

Right?
Posted by ----------<<<<- 2004-11-11 7:47:14 AM||   2004-11-11 7:47:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Next time one is in their waters they should just sink it. Ain't no denying it crossed the link if the wreck is sitting on the bottom.

Then again, they could sink it and then just say "What sub? Did you lose a sub?"
Posted by Laurence of the Rats  2004-11-11 8:10:19 AM|| [http://www.punictreachery.com/]  2004-11-11 8:10:19 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 The Japanese need to lower the response time in order to catch it IN territorial waters to sink it. I am sure they are looking that issue over now.
Posted by Alaska Paul  2004-11-11 10:59:35 AM||   2004-11-11 10:59:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 AP, yep. I think the IJN knew exactly where the sub was and it did something they didn't like, so they lit it up, politcally and acoustically.
Posted by Shipman 2004-11-11 11:40:28 AM||   2004-11-11 11:40:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Oh, that sub...
Posted by The Commie Chinese 2004-11-11 12:14:07 PM||   2004-11-11 12:14:07 PM|| Front Page Top

00:53 Leigh
00:04 PBMcL
23:59 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:57 Zhang Fei
23:54 .com
23:51 Bomb-a-rama
23:50 AzCat
23:49 AzCat
23:46 OldSpook
23:38 SC88
23:35 ex-lib
23:34 AzCat
23:33 True German Ally
23:32 someone
23:27 someone
23:27 Rearden
23:23 Stephen
23:19 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:19 Korora
23:18 Atomic Conspiracy
23:12 Mike Sylwester
23:06 Frank G
23:06 Frank G
23:03 Bomb-a-rama









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com