Article

2005-02-15 Home Front: WoT

Army creates badge for non-infantry soldiers who participate in combat

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Seafarious 2005-02-15 12:35:15 AM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 The sidebar at the link gives this interesting criterion: Effective date: Sept. 11, 2001 (retroactive). I propose we also award the CCB to the members of the FDNY, NYPD, and the passengers of Flight 93.

Posted by Seafarious 2005-02-15 12:50:45 AM|| 2005-02-15 12:50:45 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Minor factual error - CIB and CMB go above left breast pocket, not right hand side.

Posted by Lone Ranger 2005-02-15 2:59:32 AM|| 2005-02-15 2:59:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 A second to the Lone Ranger.

Of course, it will now be handed out in droves to everyone in combat slot and not 11B whose units saw combat, whether they saw combat or not.

Now what are we going to offer the MP units that see combat? Or the convoy drivers that have that special experience of having to fight their way out of the cluster that their leaders get them in?

If the Army is truly changing then there should be a single patch to denote seeing combat up close and personal, regardless of the unit you were in or attached to.

Posted by Jame Retief 2005-02-15 6:46:25 AM|| 2005-02-15 6:46:25 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 ..I'm definitely for this, but the 'under fire' rule needs to be hard and fast.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2005-02-15 7:26:13 AM|| 2005-02-15 7:26:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Retief understands jointness.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-02-15 7:30:27 AM|| 2005-02-15 7:30:27 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 There is a continual effort by certain officers to get citations and awards, any citations and awards, to justify their existence. So they apply for each and every school and course opening, and endlessly self-promote and go "medal fishing", like flying over a combat zone in a helicopter for the CIB. They view doing their job as "slack time" in between schools, and usually are poor performers. Some commands even encourage them to do this, to get them away on TDY instead of screwing up in their real job. However, other commands are equally stingy in handing out deserved citations for "just doing your job", no matter how exemplary your performance. This explains why some REMF officer is highly decorated while a seasoned combat NCO has about three mandatory ribbons on his class 'A's.

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-02-15 8:39:44 AM|| 2005-02-15 8:39:44 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 The Army still operates under a Branch system. Branches being Infantry, Armor, Artillery....etc. While Moose is right that some REMFs can have more medals [usually 100% for merit vice combat and anyone in can tell the difference between the two], the value of any device is more relative to the branch of the individual rather than service as a whole. Promotions and selections are more dependent within the branch and its related Military Occupation Specialties (MOS) than considered in the whole of the organization. Thus while the article states "The new badge will be the equivalent of the Armyâs Combat Infantry Badge", its comparing apples and oranges. The new badge has more to do within the branches which will receive them, but in the general population the CIB will still be considered the senior of the two.

Posted by Uneagum Wheremp9442 2005-02-15 10:36:48 AM|| 2005-02-15 10:36:48 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 We have what's called the Combat Action Ribbon or CAR which any MOS can wear so long as you were shot at. A bullet doesn't give a fuck what your MOS is. That way you don't run into this nonsense about who gets what based on MOS. E.G. - Every Marine a rifleman, that's innate. Every Marine officer has the basic knowledge on how to command a rifle platoon & even a company. That's the difference between a warrior culture and an organization of MOS's - hence the U.S. Army.

Posted by Jarhead 2005-02-15 12:42:26 PM|| 2005-02-15 12:42:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Reminds me of the old First Shirt joke:

"I don't much care about the bullet with my name on it - that will happen when it happens. Now the one with To Whom It May Concern on it, well now, that's a different matter... I want you to kill that sumbitch before he squeezes off. Do you read me, troopers?"

*obligatory roof-raising response*

Posted by .com 2005-02-15 12:49:10 PM|| 2005-02-15 12:49:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 I thought that was what the campaign service ribbon/medals were supposed to signify.

I think this is bs

But then I was in the old army (which is in no way intended to criticize the new army. I have nothing but absolute respect and admiration for these guys and their accomplishments)

Posted by Michael 2005-02-15 1:13:04 PM|| 2005-02-15 1:13:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Whatever makes people feel a part of the fight. Real soldiers could care less about medals. They know where they've been and what they've done. No reason to show off medals when a couple good war stories will suffice. If people want to see proof, show 'em your scars.

Posted by shellback 2005-02-15 1:50:46 PM|| 2005-02-15 1:50:46 PM|| Front Page Top

18:02 trailing wife
18:02 trailing wife
23:59 3dc
23:54 3dc
23:54 jackal
23:10 Mark Z.
23:09 Barbara Skolaut
23:05 .com
23:04 Barbara Skolaut
23:02 Barbara Skolaut
23:00 Alaska Paul
22:59 Barbara Skolaut
22:58 Barbara Skolaut
22:54 .com
22:53 AJackson
22:51 DMFD
22:50 IToldYouSo
22:49 2b
22:48 DMFD
22:47 Frank G
22:45 Doc8404
22:43 CrazyFool
22:26 Grunter
22:25 Ray