Article

2005-03-31 Home Front: Tech

Dumb Brookings Institute Pronouncement (nice pictures, though)

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-03-31 11:55:00 AM|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I didn't see anything about plans to incorporate the Zionist Death Ray into our military. Mounted on satelites would be cool. Code name: The Wrath of Allan.

Oh, and the Earth Quake generator too. Where does that fit in?

Posted by BrerRabbit 2005-03-31 12:29:16 PM|| 2005-03-31 12:29:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 This the same Brookings Institute that was quiet during the large-scale RIFs between 1991-2002?

Posted by Pappy 2005-03-31 12:43:06 PM|| 2005-03-31 12:43:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Should've added that folks like the Brookings Institute people favor 'investment' in troops, because they're a relatively cheap and fungible asset to acquire, maintain, and (especially) demobilise compared to weapon systems. Troops also don't have political-turf support either.

Posted by Pappy 2005-03-31 12:50:09 PM|| 2005-03-31 12:50:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 They didn't want to reduce the F-22 buy to double digits. I guess they've cut that one back as far as they can already.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-03-31 12:53:40 PM|| 2005-03-31 12:53:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 New weaponry lasts decades. Troops are lost when their enlistment periods run out. That's the reality. New weaponry takes years, perhaps decades, to get operational. Fresh troops can be trained up in several months. Brookings, the liberal think-tank usually described as moderate by the New York Times, is doing its usual schtick.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2005-03-31 2:28:32 PM|| [http://timurileng.blogspot.com] 2005-03-31 2:28:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 The development cycle for remotely operated and unmanned equipment is (much) shorter, in large part becuase the safety and reliability criteria are lower.

Posted by phil_b 2005-03-31 2:57:25 PM|| 2005-03-31 2:57:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Brookings pronouncements on American National Security issues should be taken with the same sincerity as Vicente Fox's - they're on the other side IMO

Posted by Frank G 2005-03-31 2:57:36 PM|| 2005-03-31 2:57:36 PM|| Front Page Top

22:41 CrazyFool
22:41 CrazyFool
23:51 Canuck
23:46 3dc
23:19 Frank G
23:15 CrazyFool
23:14 Zhang Fei
23:07 CrazyFool
23:03 Bobby
22:58 jackal
22:56 Bobby
22:55 anymouse
22:54 Bobby
22:48 Darth VAda
22:43 jackal
22:42 .com
22:37 RWV
22:36 Uleque Hupains4886
22:36 jackal
22:33 jackal
22:29 jackal
22:18 Zpaz
22:17 Asedwich
22:17 Darth VAda