Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 06/08/2005 View Tue 06/07/2005 View Mon 06/06/2005 View Sun 06/05/2005 View Sat 06/04/2005 View Fri 06/03/2005 View Thu 06/02/2005
1
2005-06-08 Arabia
Saudis Deny Persecuting Christians
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2005-06-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Then they won't have a problem when Liberalhawk and I open up a Jewish synagogue in Jeddah, right? Because it will suddenly be legal for us to enter their country?
Posted by trailing wife 2005-06-08 00:25||   2005-06-08 00:25|| Front Page Top

#2 Semantics and showmanship. Purest bullshit.

I know, for a fact, of several instances of intimidation against Christians. My favorite is when some muttawas - self-annointed Muzzy protectors of the faith - broke down the door of a friend's house and ripped the single little strand of blinking Christmas lights he had put up around the ceiling in his den. Apparently they were able to detect the blinking multi-colored frivolity through a slit in his drapes and it drove them insane. The funny thing is, they wouldn't have detected it driving by, they had to be up at the window, peeking, to have seen anything. Otherwise, it could've been the TV causing the only barely noticeable changing levels of illumination behind his thick drapes. Oh, did I mention that it was a side window, not the front, to boot? Details. They must've sensed it with their highly developed keen awareness of frivolity, methinks. He was single then, so there was no woman to peek at... which makes it even more, um, disconcerting.

And this was inside Aramco Camp, not out there, in the shit. He was protected by being an Aramcon, from physical arrest and detainment. Out there, it would've been jail - and there they can do any damned thing to you they feel like. That he had received them in a personal effects shipment which wasn't closely checked indicates the special status / more relaxed attitude accorded Aramcons.

I was sent a box of cookies by a former girlfriend, once. I received a box of crumbs. Every single cookie they didn't eat was crumbled to sand grain size. I guess they were checking for (cue hacksaw jokes) crucifixes or drugs or contraband pr0n or something, baked into the cookies. Luckily, they were just cookies or I would've been grilled for it.

I've dumped a few other stories here for their amusement value, such as the famous photograph of Einstein that my Indian friend, a physicist, was able to convince the customs guy was his uncle. Otherwise they would have confiscated it cuz it was a Jooo - oooooh! - and gone through everything else 10x more closely.

But to say that any expression of Christianity (or Hinduism or Buddhism or, gasp, Judaism) is even tolerated in private is total bullshit. The muttawas must be getting antsy to prove how Islamic they are, too. Not being able to string anyone up must be painful. Jealousy is an ugly thing.
Posted by .com 2005-06-08 02:56||   2005-06-08 02:56|| Front Page Top

#3 Ok then Mr Islamic tolerance, allow Bibles in the country and allow Christian churches and Jewish synagouges to be built. Allow Christians to worship openly and in public and to be free to promote their religion.

Or is it that the West of Christian heritage is just profoundly more tolerant than the shriveled and pathethic notion of islamic tolerance? I wonder how this supposed inherant tolerance of islam gets around the absolute fact that mo's dying wish, his last words were to purify the Arabian penninsula of all Christians and Jews. I wonder how they get around the idea that it was mo himself that instituted dhimmitude and prohibited Christians from fully practicing their faith by prohibiting them from spreading their faith or openly promoting it in any way, a prohibition that contradicts the Great Commission of Christ.

'slam was never as tolerant as we are now and never will be as tolerant as we are now. The proof is there for all to see. Its a myth contradicted by cold bare facts and historical evidence. And anyone who says different is a bald faced liar.

Posted by peggy 2005-06-08 09:38||   2005-06-08 09:38|| Front Page Top

#4 Oh it's the good old "tolerant" religion tripe yet again. Maybe it's just a translator error. Maybe the word has a very different meaning for Saudis. Either way, methinks nasty little official saudi troll can rot with the rest of em when the oil runs dry and the party ends.
Posted by Tkat 2005-06-08 10:10||   2005-06-08 10:10|| Front Page Top

#5 
Posted by True German Ally 2005-06-08 13:54||   2005-06-08 13:54|| Front Page Top

00:04 DO
00:01 JosephMendiola
23:36 Paul Moloney
23:31 trailing wife
23:29 Phil Fraering
23:21 trailing wife
23:00 trailing wife
22:44 Lone Ranger
22:22 Joey
22:21 3dc
22:18 Jackal
22:14 49 pan
22:12 .com
22:07 JosephMendiola
22:06 Alaska Paul
22:02 Ptah
21:59 3dc
21:57 muck4doo
21:57 Pappy
21:38 Mike
21:27 Pappy
21:18 mojo
21:01 Cyber Sarge
21:00 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com