Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 06/28/2005 View Mon 06/27/2005 View Sun 06/26/2005 View Sat 06/25/2005 View Fri 06/24/2005 View Thu 06/23/2005 View Wed 06/22/2005
1
2005-06-28 Home Front: Politix
The supreme put-down
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2005-06-28 11:13|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 More proof the CIA is hopelessly rotten. Much like the UN.
Posted by mmurray821 2005-06-28 11:27||   2005-06-28 11:27|| Front Page Top

#2 The "supreme put-down?" WTF? This is actionable, if true! This proves even more that the CIA needs to be cleaned out (like the State Dept.) and quick! Hope that Porter Goss is taking this to heart!
Posted by BA">BA  2005-06-28 11:35||   2005-06-28 11:35|| Front Page Top

#3  This was the pre-Goss CIA, though many of the problems from it remain.

And people wonder why they were wrong on WMDs ...
Posted by Dan Darling">Dan Darling  2005-06-28 11:37|| http://www.regnumcrucis.blogspot.com]">[http://www.regnumcrucis.blogspot.com]  2005-06-28 11:37|| Front Page Top

#4 finally, liberals and conservatives can agree. The CIA sucs
Posted by 2b 2005-06-28 11:39||   2005-06-28 11:39|| Front Page Top

#5 That Karl Rove guy is pretty bright. He knew we'd have to have a base to attack the Mullahs, so that was the real reason we invaded Iraq - to get airfields right next to the real target.

As soon as Hilly, Billy, Johnny, Dickey, Joey, et al hear this, they'll see it as an opportunity to show how dumb W is and eventually get on board with the plan to punish the real perpetrators of 9/11. Maybe we could even get the "insurgents" to join us in attacking the old enemy?

Sometimes I wonder about myself...
Posted by Bobby 2005-06-28 11:53||   2005-06-28 11:53|| Front Page Top

#6 I have too question the time and evidence. We are near a HUGE national holiday and nearing the One-year anniversary according to the first sentence in the article. Also, no names from the commission, no names from the CIA, no date of WHEN the author talked to the commissioner in question, who's name we don't know. It all sounds shocking and detailed, yet easy to write up fiction. And do oyu REALLY think the commission would hold this back if they found it? This finding could make the politcal careers skyrocket. "The men who discovered the Bush Conspiracy!" That's what the headlines would read if they revealed it! I Don't think this is true at all.
Posted by Charles 2005-06-28 12:36||   2005-06-28 12:36|| Front Page Top

#7  How would this represent the Bush conspiracy? If anything, it would simply serve to highlight the problems with the CIA that we've discussed before.

Moreover, remember how politicized the 9/11 Commission was.
Posted by Dan Darling">Dan Darling  2005-06-28 12:47|| http://www.regnumcrucis.blogspot.com]">[http://www.regnumcrucis.blogspot.com]  2005-06-28 12:47|| Front Page Top

#8 A lot of Air Force and Army photo interpreters end up in DC, working for NPIC, NISC, NMIC, NIMA, or whatever else they're calling the imagery intelligence fusion center there these days. They all have the same complaint: they report, the CIA "senior analysts" ignore their reports. The rot is in the upper levels, not the rank and file. Porter Goss has his hands full cleaning house. Condoleese Rice has a similar problem at State, in THEIR intelligence organization, as well as among the "senior management". The same goes for most of the other cabinet agencies. The entire Washington culture needs to be broken up and disposed of, but it's not going to happen until the people of this country decide enough is enough, and break some heads.
Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot  2005-06-28 15:03|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]  2005-06-28 15:03|| Front Page Top

#9 I'm not too sure about the breaking heads, but issuing pink slips and promoting folks that can tell the difference between "actionable intel" and "intel to get promoted by" would be nice.
Posted by 49 pan 2005-06-28 19:40||   2005-06-28 19:40|| Front Page Top

00:09 Lord Waldemart
23:52 Jennie Taliaferro
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:35 Jennie Taliaferro
23:32 Jennie Taliaferro
23:22 Silentbrick
23:18 Red Lief
23:17 Captain America
23:16 Jan
22:45 Frank G
22:44 Jan
22:36 Sock Puppet 0’ Doom
22:35 Sock Puppet 0’ Doom
22:32 Silentbrick
22:32 Rex Mundi
22:28 Anonymoose
22:18 Spock
22:14 Frank G
22:05 WITT
22:04 Diabolo Guapo
22:04 Phil Fraering
22:03 Atomic Conspiracy
21:58 Red Dog
21:57 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com