Article

2005-06-28 Israel-Palestine

Which Came First - Terrorism or "Occupation"?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2005-06-28 08:33|| || Front Page|| [15 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Jeeze! Wotta quagmire! Them Israelites should go back home to ... oh, waitaminute...

Posted by Bobby 2005-06-28 09:12|| 2005-06-28 09:12|| Front Page Top

#2 To anyone who believes we should negotiate a "peacefull" ending to the war on terror:
The first thing on every terrorist list is that the state of Israel does not have the right to exist i.e. they must die.
The second thing on every terrorist list is that any western interest in the middle east must be removed.
The third thing is that only a strict islamic govt can "protect" the people from the horrible western influences (like showers and condoms).

Posted by bigjim-ky 2005-06-28 10:39|| 2005-06-28 10:39|| Front Page Top

#3 Israel should have pushed the Palestinians out of the West Bank and Gaza following the 1967 war. The world was stunned and there was no question who had genocidal intent. Now time has passed and history has been rewritten for the ignorant.

Until the Arabs are in a position to make such a genocidal attack again the problem will probably not be resolved.

Posted by RJ Schwarz 2005-06-28 12:20|| 2005-06-28 12:20|| Front Page Top

00:09 Lord Waldemart
23:52 Jennie Taliaferro
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:35 Jennie Taliaferro
23:32 Jennie Taliaferro
23:22 Silentbrick
23:18 Red Lief
23:17 Captain America
23:16 Jan
22:45 Frank G
22:44 Jan
22:36 Sock Puppet 0â Doom
22:35 Sock Puppet 0â Doom
22:32 Silentbrick
22:32 Rex Mundi
22:28 Anonymoose
22:18 Spock
22:14 Frank G
22:05 WITT
22:04 Diabolo Guapo
22:04 Phil Fraering
22:03 Atomic Conspiracy
21:58 Red Dog
21:57 Frank G