Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 06/29/2005 View Tue 06/28/2005 View Mon 06/27/2005 View Sun 06/26/2005 View Sat 06/25/2005 View Fri 06/24/2005 View Thu 06/23/2005
1
2005-06-29 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Justice Soutter
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by raptor 2005-06-29 13:12|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Doh!
Posted by David Souter 2005-06-29 13:45||   2005-06-29 13:45|| Front Page Top

#2 Nope - I've kept my eyes open about this too. I reckon hell keep his mouth shut though.

I'm VERY excited to see how this plays out.
Posted by Yosemite Sam 2005-06-29 14:13||   2005-06-29 14:13|| Front Page Top

#3 Is he still "jogging" in the DC parks late at night? Just wondering...
Posted by tu3031 2005-06-29 16:03||   2005-06-29 16:03|| Front Page Top

#4 Drew Curtis over at FARK has already started a sign up list to attend a FARK party at the new Liberty Lost hotel in 2006 or 2007. The last count was 59 pledges to attend.
I wonder if the other four justices who never read the Constitution either are beginning to worry about the future of their abode? Could make for an interesting summer.
Posted by GK 2005-06-29 17:35||   2005-06-29 17:35|| Front Page Top

#5 A friend just sent me the link to the town of Weare's web page. It includes the names of the Board of Selectmen's names and expiration of office. A RBer
suggested yesterday that the five selectmen be replaced with pro-"Liberty Lost" candidates. Good idea,but may not be practical since two members terms expire in 2006, one in 2007, and the other two are scheduled to be in office until 2008.

I certainly would not want to be a board member because the Supreme Court ruling has all the makings for anarchy. Imagine if the majority of the board disallow Clement's application then their property may be next for eminent domain condemnation. If they rule in favor of the application, someone who agrees with the Kelo taking decision might seek revenge by seeking condemnation for a similar purpose. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

I'm considering becoming a FARKER just to help keep the pressure on Weare and Souter. BTW, Drew only needed 100 committments to the Farker Party at Liberty Lost Hotel, at latest count 250 Farkers have signed up.
Posted by GK 2005-06-29 20:07||   2005-06-29 20:07|| Front Page Top

#6 If they refuse to use the power of eminent domain, he can sue them in court to *force* them. If this is how it goes it will be interesting to see how they defend the *loss* of jobs and tax revenues in court -- and to the voters.
Posted by .com 2005-06-29 22:52||   2005-06-29 22:52|| Front Page Top

23:59 trailing wife
23:56 Frank G
23:51 trailing wife
23:45 muck4doo
23:41 Rex Mundi
23:29 Rex Mundi
23:27 Just About Enough!
23:26 Just About Enough!
23:25 Just About Enough!
23:22 .com
23:14 ed
23:12 ed
23:06 .com
23:05 half
23:03 Atomic Conspiracy
23:00 Shipman
22:59 Just About Enough!
22:59 Shipman
22:58 Just About Enough!
22:57 abu Bruce
22:55 Shipman
22:54 Threresing Crinerong3617
22:54 Just About Enough!
22:52 .com









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com