Article

2005-07-09 Iraq-Jordan

Insurgent capabilities neutralized in Baghdad

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-07-09 00:23|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I didn't bother to check, but this is presumably a wire-service dispatch. Thus the "remarkably positive picture" crack. It's only "remarkably positive" if you don't understand military affairs, haven't been paying attention, tend to view things through a wildly distorted prism, and and aren't too sharp to begin with. Things have been markedly better for some time, at least WRT to car bombs. Vest bombs, however, are up sharply -- more good news, though the media would never stumble across that bit of common sense. The idiots are going to vest bombs (far less powerful, and easier to defense in most situations) because they HAVE TO. But when the vest bomb trend finally hits the headlines, it will be marketed as the latest impressive innovation of an "adaptive, sophisticated" enemy, not the latest desperate change in tactics by a force that has lost the initiative.

Posted by Verlaine in Iraq 2005-07-09 03:01|| 2005-07-09 03:01|| Front Page Top

#2 Gen. Webster is an idiot.

I should know, I am an infantryman assigned to one of his subordinate units. Webster is a typical officer/politician, not at all interested in winning a war, just interested in not losing it while his unit is on the clock. Bombing in Baghdad has been cyclical for the last couple of years. It hits high points around key religious holidays and historical events, and then cools off. He should know this, but he's too busy sitting on his fat ass up in Camp Victory, congratulating himself on what a fine job he's done and speculating on what higher command he's now entitled to.

Furthermore, the insurgency consists of various groups with conflicting aims. The domestic insurgents seem to be quiescent at present, true, but recently there was a spectacularly successful series of VBIED attacks perpetrated by a group of Syrian fighters. Syrians, Iranians, Somalis, Palestinians, we've got ourselves a proper witches' brew boiling here. This rant isn't to say that we can't win, or that given time we won't win. What my point is is that we won't win as long as useless placesitters, spineless politicians, and weaseley lawyers pretending to be senior officers are in charge. This Army has lots of warriors. Good, honorable, hard working warriors. Men who would rather be out in the fight than behind the walls of our FOBs. But like every Socialist boondoggle, the Army is run by careerist weasels who don't give a fiddler's fart if American soldiers die, just as long as it doesn't affect their next OER. And though they would never pick up a rifle or a shovel they will do yeoman's work in protecting their precious fiefdoms and their mediocracies from better men.

Resign your commission and leave my Army you piece of crap.

Posted by Simple Simon 2005-07-09 03:16|| 2005-07-09 03:16|| Front Page Top

#3 Thanks Verlaine, been enjoying your comments for a while now. Is your job in the Zone independant from the 1 year rotation?

Simple Simon, Thanks for being there. please come back and tell us more.

Posted by Red Dog 2005-07-09 03:29|| 2005-07-09 03:29|| Front Page Top

#4 I'm a REMF at the Palace in the IZ, a civilian (also on a one-year stint, but thinking of extending through the elections in Dec/Jan).

What Simon says here tracks with a lot of scattered anecdotal data I've been hearing for over a year from various (all Army) types. Not the vitriol directed at senior brass (which I can't dispute from my perspective), but specific complaints about a lack of aggressiveness and seriousness in dealing with the enemy. It's the best military the world has ever seen, but it's not neccessarily being applied in the most effective manner.

As to the "success" of any sort of terrorist attack here, I wonder whether that term means much apart from actual impact on the political process. If 10 car bombs kill X number of grandmothers and police recruits in a 2 week period, and the next day the TNA reports out a constitution with reasonable support from Kurd, Shi'a, and establishment Sunni leadership -- what was the significance of the car bombs?

I'm tempted to say that the car bombs are exactly like the huge number of "successful" kamikaze hits on US Navy ships off Okinawa -- lots of blood and ships sunk/damaged, zero impact on the outcome of the operation.

Much like the WWII kamikazes, the "insurgents" here are probably only affecting the cost and timetable of their defeat here -- not averting the defeat itself.

Posted by Verlaine in Iraq 2005-07-09 05:42|| 2005-07-09 05:42|| Front Page Top

#5 Feather merchants have been the Bane of militaries since at least as far back as the Roman Empire.As dispicable as they are they seem to be a fact of military life.

Posted by raptor 2005-07-09 07:58|| 2005-07-09 07:58|| Front Page Top

#6 kind of goes along with zawkawi's rant that he 's having trouble finding male splodeydopes--and his spiritual-spit-leader's advice to him to take the jihad elseware--something's happening here--even if the c.o is a doofus--he'd be an idiot to spout this positive spin unless he knew something's up--btw the red on red stuff and the change in the "list" voting procedures so that sunnis get a piece of the pie are very telling--the wind up will be confused process not a ceremony on the u.s.s. missouri

Posted by SON OF TOLUI 2005-07-09 12:01|| 2005-07-09 12:01|| Front Page Top

20:07 tsotsi
19:56 tsotsi
19:42 tsotsi
19:36 tsotsi
18:43 tsotsi
02:35 tsotsi
00:01 tarantino4doo
23:57 muck4doo
23:52 Jan
23:31 Red Dog
23:22 Thomong Whoting3058
23:17 Robert Crawford
22:55 Phil Fraering
22:48 Phil Fraering
22:44 Phil Fraering
22:37 Brett
22:30 JosephMendiola
21:51 JosephMendiola
21:47 Frank G
21:46 Sock Puppet 0â Doom
21:46 Darth VAda
21:46 Frank G
21:45 Abu Al Bundy
21:43 Thraing Hupoluper1864