Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 07/22/2005 View Thu 07/21/2005 View Wed 07/20/2005 View Tue 07/19/2005 View Mon 07/18/2005 View Sun 07/17/2005 View Sat 07/16/2005
1
2005-07-22 International-UN-NGOs
Greenland soon green? Greenpeace is upset!
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2005-07-22 14:27|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 What do they propose we do? Elect a Democrat, by chance?
Posted by bigjim-ky 2005-07-22 15:02||   2005-07-22 15:02|| Front Page Top

#2 My question,what is the right climate? We know the climate is constantly changing,so just what does Greenpeace believe is the perfect climate? Since climate change is natural,I would have thought that those who believe in protecting nature the most,would want the least interference in controlling the climate.
Posted by Stephen 2005-07-22 15:06||   2005-07-22 15:06|| Front Page Top

#3 
In 1988, the glacier was advancing at just five kilometers per year
So they admit that as late as 1988, we were in the throes of global cooling? Whew! Thank goodness we dodged that bullet. No need to thank us SUV-owners - happy to help out. ;-p

"How many more urgent warnings does the (US President George W.) Bush administration need before it takes meaningful action on climate change?"
Hey, dipshit, CONGRESS voted during the Clintoon administration that we would not ratify your destroy-America wet dream Kyoto treaty.

The President doesn't "take" this kind of "meaningful action" - Congress does. And right now, that meaningful action is to NOT sign on to anything that will destroy America's economy.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2005-07-22 15:06||   2005-07-22 15:06|| Front Page Top

#4 I suggest gathering all the Greenpeace members to Greenland and have them push the glacier back into place.
Posted by ed 2005-07-22 15:52||   2005-07-22 15:52|| Front Page Top

#5 By chance just what do they refer to the climate of the late Middle Ages that was considerably warmer than now. As I recall wine grapes were being grown in southern Britian then something that I still think can't be done today. Settlers in Greenland were able to maintain viable communities primarliy in the SW part of the island. I do remember seeing copies of letters from Bishops describing visits of either them selves or proxies to Greenland as late as 1450?

Plus just how do these idiots think we could stop a major shift in climate change if one is going on now (I think the climate is going through a period of change, its just that it is always going through a period of change. Plus the change rate is variable also). The only way we could effect a reduction in the rate of change is to undertake a massive program of some for of industry. Either in changing the energy production process or in the introduction of gasses into the atmosphere to get the change desired. Kind of ironic that to save the planet* they would have to rely on industry

*The notion that they can "save" the planet to me merely illustrates the heights of arrogance that these people have reached
Posted by Cheaderhead 2005-07-22 16:57||   2005-07-22 16:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Wasn't Greenland specifically named "Groenland" (green country) by the vickings or something because at the time its coasts were ice free and, well, green with moss?
Posted by anonymous5089 2005-07-22 16:58||   2005-07-22 16:58|| Front Page Top

#7 I believe that the name Greenland was coined after Viking focus groups indicated that few settlers were interested in migating to Coldasawitchsbosumland.
Posted by Super Hose 2005-07-22 17:04||   2005-07-22 17:04|| Front Page Top

#8 Kinda funny that the same folks who swear by evolution believe in a static environment.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2005-07-22 17:29||   2005-07-22 17:29|| Front Page Top

#9 send more grant money and your SUV's to us now
Posted by Climatescientist">Climatescientist  2005-07-22 17:51||   2005-07-22 17:51|| Front Page Top

#10 Cheaderhead, I am pretty much convinced we can cool the climate any time we like by injecting large quantities of dust into the midlevel atmosphere.
Posted by phil_b 2005-07-22 19:14||   2005-07-22 19:14|| Front Page Top

#11 Hush Hose, we knew it has the happy hunting ground.
Posted by Shamu 2005-07-22 20:29||   2005-07-22 20:29|| Front Page Top

#12 So, if global warming really exists, I could go to Michigan or North Dakota to retire and not Florida. If that's the case I'm in favor of global warming.
Posted by Cosmic Crusader 2005-07-22 21:42||   2005-07-22 21:42|| Front Page Top

12:55 Flinert Ebberemp1347
00:00 Fun Dung Poo
23:58 Seafarious
23:50 Barbara Skolaut
23:50 DMFD
23:47 Barbara Skolaut
23:22 True German Ally
23:14 trailing wife
23:12 Frank G
23:09 trailing wife
23:08 Captain America
22:47 trailing wife
22:42 Frank G
22:39 Anonymoose
22:38 AbuRatCatcherToTheStars
22:34 Kalle (kafir forever)
22:31 JosephMendiola
22:28 Pappy
22:25 Kalle (kafir forever)
22:25 Frank G
22:19 Pappy
22:16 JosephMendiola
22:14 Frank G
22:11 Jackal









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com