Article

2005-07-27 Britain

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-07-27 09:23|| || Front Page|| [11132 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Deportation is great against the furriners, but what are you going to do with the home-grown jihadi pigs?

Posted by BH 2005-07-27 10:29|| 2005-07-27 10:29|| Front Page Top

#2 Surely there is some uninhabited island somewhere that can be used as a holding pen during contested deportations.

Posted by Neutron Tom 2005-07-27 10:31|| 2005-07-27 10:31|| Front Page Top

#3 Londonstan is a stupid term because 'stan is used for nations not cities.

I suggest Londobad and the United Caliphate of Great Britianistan and North Ireland.

Posted by Muhammad al-Massari 2005-07-27 10:58|| 2005-07-27 10:58|| Front Page Top

#4 "Backlash City"?

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2005-07-27 11:00|| 2005-07-27 11:00|| Front Page Top

#5 Keep it up, judiciary & lawyers on both sides of the pond.

When a government won't protect it's law abiding citizens, they will protect themselves.

Posted by Hyper">Hyper 2005-07-27 12:08|| 2005-07-27 12:08|| Front Page Top

#6 What Hyper said.

Posted by Secret Master 2005-07-27 12:24|| 2005-07-27 12:24|| Front Page Top

#7 Deporting terrorists to Dominica only exports terror cells and gives them new staging ground and smuggling routes. Dominica is not an unihabited island in the middle of no where; it is uncomfortably close in the Caribbean. The President wants to return to the moon, which would make a great desolate internment camp, IMHO.

Posted by Danielle 2005-07-27 13:20|| 2005-07-27 13:20|| Front Page Top

#8 The President wants to return to the moon, which would make a great desolate internment camp

Ms. Danielle - Mars would be better...

Posted by BigEd 2005-07-27 13:53|| 2005-07-27 13:53|| Front Page Top

#9 The issue was that of the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees, which says in Article 32: "The Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security or public order."

Mr al-Massari was eventually allowed to stay in Britain and is now protected even more because of the European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into British law by the Human Rights Act of 1998.

No entangling treaties! (hat tip to Thomas Jefferson)

Hey MS, tell me again why the UN, ICC and Kyoto are good for America?

Physcho Hillbilly
Slayer of Routing Loops

Posted by Psycho Hillbilly 2005-07-27 14:25|| 2005-07-27 14:25|| Front Page Top

#10 Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security Check! or public order." Check!. Whats the hold-up? Don't let the infidel door hit you in the ass as you go.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-07-27 14:40|| 2005-07-27 14:40|| Front Page Top

#11 "Ms. Danielle - Mars would be better..."

Not true, Mars might conceivably support life....

Posted by Slinens Angising3508 2005-07-27 14:41|| 2005-07-27 14:41|| Front Page Top

#12 We left our flag all over the moon.

IT'S US TERRITORY.

No treaty problem of any sort for the US (not UK) to send folks there. Don't see any requirement for an internal prison to have oxygen either.

Posted by 3dc 2005-07-27 15:58|| 2005-07-27 15:58|| Front Page Top

#13 I could be wrong but I think the US signed a treaty stating that nobody could claim the moon or other space objects.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-07-27 16:14|| 2005-07-27 16:14|| Front Page Top

#14 Screw it, just hire some "out of work" Bulgarians who used to deport people from the quick to the dead and be done with it. I don't believe that in the UK the government faces the "restraints" we do here, they just act as if they do.

Posted by Sock Puppet 0â Doom 2005-07-27 16:16|| 2005-07-27 16:16|| Front Page Top

#15 rjschwarz
No problem. If we did we can just withdraw from it when we need to. Nobody else is really close to getting there.

Posted by 3dc 2005-07-27 16:32|| 2005-07-27 16:32|| Front Page Top

#16 Yes, we Brits will defend ourselves. We'll swat the jihadis away with our rolled-up copies of the Radio Times.

Posted by The Shining Skull 2005-07-27 20:14|| 2005-07-27 20:14|| Front Page Top

#17 We don't need to OWN the moon to deport them TO the moon, rjschwarz! But it would be cheaper to just drop them off somewhere between London and Bermuda.

Posted by Neutron Tom 2005-07-27 20:21|| 2005-07-27 20:21|| Front Page Top

#18 Any of the Lagrange points, L1-L5, would suit. No jurisdictional problems there, I'm sure.

Posted by .com 2005-07-27 20:32|| 2005-07-27 20:32|| Front Page Top

#19 No way .com! - *I* want to go to L-5 before some stinkin' Jihadi. SPoD's got the right idea.

I have 'The High Frontier' by Gerard K O'Neill not 3 feet from my head - I thought the future might be like that, but we're not there just yet...

Posted by Tony (UK) 2005-07-27 22:31|| 2005-07-27 22:31|| Front Page Top

18:06 Snetch Crising8884
18:01 Snetch Crising8884
17:55 Snetch Crising8884
17:49 Snetch Crising8884
17:44 Thineter Hupomogum5832
17:15 Thineter Hupomogum5832
17:14 Thineter Hupomogum5832
17:13 Thineter Hupomogum5832
17:11 Thineter Hupomogum5832
17:09 Thineter Hupomogum5832
16:15 Thuque Ulavitle9640
15:43 Thuque Ulavitle9640
14:49 Glese Grerenter3024
13:51 Glese Grerenter3024
17:01 Unererong Uloluper5507
17:00 Unererong Uloluper5507
16:44 Unererong Uloluper5507
16:36 Unererong Uloluper5507
23:54 11A5S
23:48 Peter Jones
23:44 Captain America
23:33 Captain America
23:30 Chris W.
23:22 GK