Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 08/01/2005 View Sun 07/31/2005 View Sat 07/30/2005 View Fri 07/29/2005 View Thu 07/28/2005 View Wed 07/27/2005 View Tue 07/26/2005
1
2005-08-01 Home Front: Tech
Discover may need in-flight repairs
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Thromotle Cleting5515 2005-08-01 09:48|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I keep getting this mental picture of a space suited astronaut with a wooden caulking mallet hammering this ceramic-fiber cloth back between the thermal tiles.
Posted by Steve">Steve  2005-08-01 10:24||   2005-08-01 10:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Someone has to pay the devil.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-08-01 10:33|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-08-01 10:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Time to fire up the ol' CFC factory. Seems to me the old foam formulation worked better, and if NASA intends to continue using the shuttle then that's what they should stick with, EPA be damned.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-08-01 10:33||   2005-08-01 10:33|| Front Page Top

#4 EPA offered NASA the exemption, but NASA passed. All the blame falls squarely on NASA. It simply is not a serious organization, it doesn't have a mission, it's stuck in the past. Who would want to work there now?
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-08-01 10:44||   2005-08-01 10:44|| Front Page Top

#5 I remember a provactive article decades ago. The idea was to kill NASA and then use its funding to offer dollar-for-dollar tax credits for anyone investing in Space. Finance Rhutan? That works. Invest in a satellite company? That's space. Build boosters? Sure.

Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2005-08-01 11:31|| home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2005-08-01 11:31|| Front Page Top

#6 Mrs Davis, I'm not so sure that NASA passed on the EPA exemption but what I remember is that the Clinton Administration mandated that NASA not use the freon. I'll try to find the documentation. I could be wrong but that's the way I remember it.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2005-08-01 12:19||   2005-08-01 12:19|| Front Page Top

#7 My immediate knee-jerk reaction was that we can live with this," he said. "On the other hand, this is bigger than we've seen before."

Off record the administrator went further:
"On the other Palp this is bigger than what we'veseen before because we have cameras there now, it could be forelonging, forelonging? It's the opposite of fore-shortening - you know 14 years old, bath-room mirror."
Posted by Shipman 2005-08-01 15:02||   2005-08-01 15:02|| Front Page Top

#8 Aw Ship... I almost fell outta my chair after that one. Goodonya
Posted by eLarson 2005-08-01 16:06|| http://larsonian.blogspot.com]">[http://larsonian.blogspot.com]  2005-08-01 16:06|| Front Page Top

23:54 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:37 Mike Sylwester
23:13 trailing wife
23:08 Fred
23:07 BigEd
23:01 muck4doo
22:58 muck4doo
22:56 Gun Hippy
22:50 OldSpook
22:50 BigEd
22:47 Jan
22:42 Angie Schultz
22:40 Captain America
22:37 Old Patriot
22:34 Atomic Conspiracy
22:33 Jan
22:28 Unomomp Whomotle2072
22:23 Unomomp Whomotle2072
22:21 Glerong Whomoting9661
22:18 Atomic Conspiracy
22:18 Jan
22:14 Mrs. Davis
22:08 Shipman
22:06 Shipman









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com