Article

2005-09-25 International-UN-NGOs

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2005-09-25 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I'm thinkin' a real, hard-hitting historical examination of Big Mo; life and times, the founding of Islam, and the establishment of the Caliphate. Followed by the sack of Constantinople, the Siege if Vienna...

Posted by mojo">mojo 2005-09-25 02:54|| 2005-09-25 02:54|| Front Page Top

#2 Ditto to all your comments, Fred. These reports that decry the poor US image abroad kill me.

First, as you point out, there's the little problem that, in fact, there are irreconcilable differences between not just us and our literal enemies but between us and many regular people who prefer institutionalized misogyny, racism, dictatorship, and religious tyranny to western concepts of an open society.

Second, AFAIK these "analyses" never even mention the largest factor in creating hostile mindsets: media disinformation, distortion, and inaccuracy (separate but kindred issues). I don't think there are any global surveys that attempt to ascertain the informational base on which their respondents base their (usually bizarre) opinions.

When you pair that "Bush is a threat to world peace" response with the information that the respondent hasn't considered the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, is unaware of the Somalia or Kosovo or Bosnia operations, is unaware of the key role played by the US in all global humanitarian relief operations, and is completely misinformed about US and enemy activities in Afghanistan and Iraq, their negative attitudes aren't much of a mystery -- or a reason for us to do squat.

Heck, huge swathes of America and most of Europe have preposterous misconceptions about US foreign policy, thanks largely to the media being completely off the rails -- why should the comparatively ignorant and unworldly Egyptian rank-and-file be any better?

And finally, I can only echo your complaint about the warm milk offered up -- intermittently -- as the only communication about our policies and the situation we face. This administration has the worst -- and most invisible -- public affairs instincts and operations in modern history. Some of us are pushing, at different levels on diverse topics, for them to come to their senses and push back, hard, on disinformation, as well as get the real stories out and frame the issues from the outset.

Posted by Verlaine in Iraq 2005-09-25 05:48|| 2005-09-25 05:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Well said Verlaine. Many of us non-Americans (those who who some grasp of what is going on) wholeheartedly support the USA. Part of the problem is that the MSM has lost the serious news consumers and is going after the market segment that considers Entertainment Tonight as news.

Posted by phil_b 2005-09-25 06:48|| 2005-09-25 06:48|| Front Page Top

#4 Phil! I thought you lived on another continent! But you have correctly devined the new WaPo. They have created a small, free paper called 'Express', which I sometimes read (past tense)on the train. But you are exactly right. They have three or four pages of news (some of which is 'read the full story in the Post') and the rest is Entertainment Tonight. And sports.

I feel SO uninformed about J-Lo and so many other people who I can't even name!

Posted by Bobby 2005-09-25 07:50|| 2005-09-25 07:50|| Front Page Top

#5 We are sending a woman to the middle east to listen? To who? Evidently to diplomats and other learned scholars and not to the average tribal leader, huh? Good plan. She can borrow my balto when she hits Yemen.

Posted by beagletwo 2005-09-25 10:26|| 2005-09-25 10:26|| Front Page Top

#6 These folks go to nations that supports terrorism and asks the families of the terrorist who the bigger threat is? Is there any suprise as to the answer? Did they invite Jane Fonda to tag along and pose on a ZSU also? WTF?

Posted by 49 pan 2005-09-25 10:53|| 2005-09-25 10:53|| Front Page Top

#7 "This administration has the worst -- and most invisible -- public affairs instincts and operations in modern history."

[RANT]

This, more than anything else, is what vexes me about the administration's conduct of the war: despite our successes on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, Bush and his advisors are passively letting the war be gradually lost, bit by bit, on the home front.

And I cannot for the life of me figure out why.

Are they completely unaware that public support is absolutely vital to the success of a war which they themselves have warned will be a "long, hard slog"?

Do they simply assume that the American people are savvy enough to figure it all out for themselves and keep themselves focused and motivated, and therefore don't need any reminders from the administration of what this war is all about?

Do they assume that Fox News, along with a tiny handful of right-leaning blogs, are sufficient all by themselves to keep up support for the war-- without any help whatsoever from the White House?

Are they too meek and timid to get in the Democrats' faces and denounce their vicious lies about the war for exactly what they are-- defeatism, sedition and treason?

Does their reticence come from some antiquated, "old-school" notion of "gentlemanly conduct" that prohibits them from fighting back?

Is their passivity the result of some political calculation by the allegedly diabolical genius of Karl Rove, that the Democrats are digging their own grave with their hysterical anti-war rhetoric and that it's best to just leave them alone?

What the hell is their damned problem????

I just don't understand it. And it bothers the hell out of me. There are other aspects of our conduct of the war which bother me, too, mainly the lack of apparent action on Iran, Syria, North Korea and Saudi Arabia; but the Bush administration's utter cluelessness on the domestic front bothers me more than anything else.

ARRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!!!!!!!!!!

[/RANT]

Posted by Dave D.">Dave D. 2005-09-25 10:56|| 2005-09-25 10:56|| Front Page Top

#8 Wow what a news flash!! this means that Dictators Dictator supporters, Islamic Radical Theocrat supporters, and thier general ilk dont like the idea of personal freedom democracy and the whole idea of allowing the ignorant/sinful peasants make decisions for themselves and of course the One Guy who whants to give them this power is consider a threat. Nawww Imagine That

Posted by C-Low 2005-09-25 10:57|| 2005-09-25 10:57|| Front Page Top

#9 âAmericaâs image and reputation abroad could hardly be worseâ,

If it can't get worse, it can only get better. Best not to worry about it then.

Posted by Baba Tutu 2005-09-25 18:31|| 2005-09-25 18:31|| Front Page Top

23:50 CrazyFool
22:55 Frank G
22:40 Katya
22:31 trailing wife
22:08 trailing wife
21:57 Edward Yee
21:55 trailing wife
21:52 Frank G
21:25 trailing wife
21:21 Anonymoose
21:17 Frank G
21:16 DanNY
21:15 Mullah Lawyer
21:13 Phil Fraering
21:01 Phil Fraering
20:59 mmurray821
20:54 RWV
20:52 Phil Fraering
20:46 Phil Fraering
20:40 PlanetDan
20:33 Pappy
20:29 Dorf
20:11 Barbara Skolaut
20:08 Shamu