Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/06/2005 View Wed 10/05/2005 View Tue 10/04/2005 View Mon 10/03/2005 View Sun 10/02/2005 View Sat 10/01/2005 View Fri 09/30/2005
1
2005-10-06 Home Front: Politix
Prosecutor reveals third grand jury had refused DeLay indictment
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-10-06 09:41|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Earl is OUT OF CONTROL!!
Posted by ARMYGUY 2005-10-06 10:59||   2005-10-06 10:59|| Front Page Top

#2 Many prosecutors get that way, especially when they retain the office for a long time. That's why we have a Bill of Rights. I trust Mr. DeLay also knows how to use the long arm of the law on Mr. Earle now that he has so egregiously overstepped the bounds of propriety. Think of the many who suffer equally at the hands of similar prosecutors without his resources.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-10-06 11:11||   2005-10-06 11:11|| Front Page Top

#3 DeLay's legal team, led by Houston lawyer Dick DeGuerin, has been taking to the airwaves to portray Earle as an incompetent prosecutor who is pursuing DeLay only as a political vendetta.

Well, they're certainly doing a good job of it -- even Earle's going along with it.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-10-06 11:38|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-10-06 11:38|| Front Page Top

#4 Goodbye Earl.
Posted by Xbalanke 2005-10-06 14:39||   2005-10-06 14:39|| Front Page Top

#5 The thing t hat stood out through the whole article to me was the Judges party affiliation. The grand jury that didn't indict was impaneled by a Republican, the other two that did indict were impaneled by Democrats. Coincidence?
Posted by Charles 2005-10-06 15:13||   2005-10-06 15:13|| Front Page Top

#6 Had a discusion with an investigator for the local prosecuters office one day.I ask him isn't it part of your job to discover the truth and seek justice,His response was"No my job is to put people in jail".This lead me to the conclusion that truth a justice is irrelavent,convictions are what is wanted.Seems to be the case here.
Posted by raptor 2005-10-06 21:00||   2005-10-06 21:00|| Front Page Top

#7 That's why we have defence attorneys. In the civil law system, every body is looking for "truth and justice". And the defendant gets screwed. At least in our system there's one guy on your side and everybody else is out to get you.
Posted by Ominesh Snolugum6259 2005-10-06 21:38||   2005-10-06 21:38|| Front Page Top

00:27 JosephMendiola
00:00 William Gates
23:54 JAB
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:46 DMFD
23:37 jules 2
23:30 Ernest Brown
23:29 .com
23:26 Captain America
23:23 .com
23:23 Alaska Paul
23:20 .com
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:16 jules 2
23:10 jules 2
23:02 SteveS
22:58 .com
22:55 .com
22:44 jules 2
22:37 Frank G
22:35 Frank G
22:15 Alaska Paul
22:08 OregonGuy
21:47 3dc









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com