Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 02/06/2006 View Sun 02/05/2006 View Sat 02/04/2006 View Fri 02/03/2006 View Thu 02/02/2006 View Wed 02/01/2006 View Tue 01/31/2006
1
2006-02-06 Home Front: Politix
Forget Hitler, now Bush is Nixon
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2006-02-06 02:01|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 So does this mean he's moved up or down on the left's scale of evil? I have a bad feeling they consider Nixon worse than Hitler.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2006-02-06 08:22|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2006-02-06 08:22|| Front Page Top

#2 It's the New Bush.
Posted by Unoter Snoth5207 2006-02-06 08:36||   2006-02-06 08:36|| Front Page Top

#3 First witness to call, William Jefferson Clinton.
Posted by ed 2006-02-06 09:21||   2006-02-06 09:21|| Front Page Top

#4 typical reaction ed. whenever bush is criticized on any issue, republicans ALWAYS bring up Clinton in comparison.
Posted by Common Sense 2006-02-06 11:22||   2006-02-06 11:22|| Front Page Top

#5 It's nice to have an irrefutable argument.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-02-06 11:24||   2006-02-06 11:24|| Front Page Top

#6 Yeah...
"Why you all pickin of Bush? Clinton did it TOO!!
Posted by Common Sense 2006-02-06 11:38||   2006-02-06 11:38|| Front Page Top

#7 "...have set the clock back..."

I've been wondering how and when the democrats were gonna work in that timeless little ditty on this issue. Yeah...Nixon...that works...Bravo!
Posted by DepotGuy 2006-02-06 11:40||   2006-02-06 11:40|| Front Page Top

#8 Vietnam isn't working anymore, so now they'll try for Watergate. When that doesn't work, maybe they'll try for Abscam.

What?

Oh.
Posted by Seafarious">Seafarious  2006-02-06 11:47||   2006-02-06 11:47|| Front Page Top

#9 heh
Posted by lotp 2006-02-06 11:49||   2006-02-06 11:49|| Front Page Top

#10 You're a hypocrit Common Sense. You had 9 years to critcize warrantless tapping. Instead nothing but the roaring silence of hypocrisy from your ilk.

February 9, 1995 EXECUTIVE ORDER 12949
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution... it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to section 302(a)(1) of the Act, the Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order, to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year

Sec. 3. Pursuant to section 303(a)(7) of the Act, the following
officials, each of whom is employed in the area of national security or
defense, is designated to make the certifications required by section
303(a)(7) of the Act in support of applications to conduct physical
searches:
(a) Secretary of State;
(b) Secretary of Defense;
(c) Director of Central Intelligence;
(d) Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation;
(e) Deputy Secretary of State;
(f) Deputy Secretary of Defense; and
(g) Deputy Director of Central Intelligence.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON THE WHITE HOUSE, February 9, 1995.
Posted by ed 2006-02-06 12:00||   2006-02-06 12:00|| Front Page Top

#11 Make that 10 years.
Posted by ed 2006-02-06 12:00||   2006-02-06 12:00|| Front Page Top

#12 And Congress can pass all the laws it wishes, blustering all the way - as the assclowns tend to do, even over vetos, and they will mean diddley-squat.
Posted by .com 2006-02-06 12:03||   2006-02-06 12:03|| Front Page Top

#13 First, there was "Bush = Hitler."
Then came "Bush = Nixon."
What's next? "Bush = Barney the Dinosaur?"
Posted by Mike 2006-02-06 12:51||   2006-02-06 12:51|| Front Page Top

#14 ed.

The criticism of Bush on the NSA program is
bi-partisan. members of both parties have called for these Congressional hearings.

I havent personally passed judgement one way or the other. I think it's a interesting Constitutional issue that will probably end up being decided upon in the judiciary.
Posted by Common Sense 2006-02-06 13:08||   2006-02-06 13:08|| Front Page Top

#15 As long as it does not get to Bush = Gore!
Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan  2006-02-06 13:11||   2006-02-06 13:11|| Front Page Top

#16 To: Senior staff, MoveOn.org
From: Marketing
Re: Additional slogans for focus group testing

Please evaluate the following and provide your comments.

"Bush = Pauly Shore"
"Bush = Joe Piscopo"
"Bush = William Hung"
"Bush = Joey Buttafuco"
"Bush = Snidley Whiplash"
"Bush = Pee Wee Herman"
Posted by Mike 2006-02-06 17:07||   2006-02-06 17:07|| Front Page Top

#17 Can we make a slight amendment to Godwin's law?
Posted by Xbalanke 2006-02-06 18:07||   2006-02-06 18:07|| Front Page Top

#18 CS: "I havent personally passed judgement one way or the other"

I smell bullshit..or troll...smell a lot alike
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2006-02-06 19:08||   2006-02-06 19:08|| Front Page Top

#19 Face it, CS - your party (which was MY party for 30 years) is stuck with Billy Boy Clinton's legacy. Unless/until you come to grips with it, you will indeed find that your snipes at Bush for security issues hit places you didn't want to hit.

We haven't even gotten into his attempts to put bugging back doors into most computer chips and all RSA encryption keys.
Posted by lotp 2006-02-06 19:32||   2006-02-06 19:32|| Front Page Top

15:28 Common Sense
11:19 Common Sense
07:44 wxjames
08:31 Chereng Uluper3625
23:12 Alaska Paul
22:57 Capsu78
22:52 trailing wife
22:51 Jake
22:50 Frank G
22:49 bigjim-ky
22:47 Frank G
22:47 Jomort Flainter5376
22:33 Jules
22:33 Capsu78
22:29 Besoeker
22:25 Besoeker
22:21 Jonathan
22:16 C-Low
22:15 RD
22:09 RD
22:09 Steve White
22:08 Jackal
22:06 MacNails
22:02 Besoeker









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com