Article

2006-06-15 Home Front: WoT

Judge Rejects Muslim Men's Claims That Rights Were Violated

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by ryuge 2006-06-15 07:31|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Sorry - this belongs in WoT Politix: Home Front WoT

Posted by ryuge 2006-06-15 07:35|| 2006-06-15 07:35|| Front Page Top

#2 "If there is another attack and it is followed - as it will be - by another roundup, this decision says 'go ahead - round up Arabs and Muslims based on nothing more than religious, ethnic identity and lock them up as immigrants for as long as you want,'" said a Georgetown University law professor connected to the Center for Constitutional Rights, David Cole.

Didn't Georgetown recently receive a large donation from one of the Saudi princelings?

Posted by trailing wife 2006-06-15 08:03|| 2006-06-15 08:03|| Front Page Top

#3 although they were here illegally, their constitutional rights were violated

Oh really?
I seem to recall that "Rights" belong to "Citizens", you don't qualify.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2006-06-15 08:23|| 2006-06-15 08:23|| Front Page Top

#4 Judge Gleeson could benefit from some effective writing classes. It took 99 pages to say, "LOL, fuck off." ?

LOL. Maybe he's working up to doing a novel.

Posted by Angolung Thoter3849 2006-06-15 08:31|| 2006-06-15 08:31|| Front Page Top

#5 Didn't Georgetown recently receive a large donation from one of the Saudi princelings?

yes, IIRC. And it supplies many top people at the State Dept.

Posted by lotp 2006-06-15 09:42|| 2006-06-15 09:42|| Front Page Top

#6 Judge Gleeson, a former federal prosecutor in Brooklyn who was appointed to the bench by President Clinton,

Posted by liberalhawk 2006-06-15 09:52|| 2006-06-15 09:52|| Front Page Top

#7 The Center for Constitutional Rights is the World Workers' Party in powdered wigs.

Posted by Seafarious">Seafarious 2006-06-15 10:07|| 2006-06-15 10:07|| Front Page Top

#8 "This decision says 'go ahead - round up Arabs and Muslims based on nothing more than religious, ethnic identity and lock them up as immigrants for as long as you want." Sounds good to me what part am I supposed to disagree with? This statement only show how far OUTSIDE the "mainstream" these people are. If after 9/11 the government began rounding up Arab or Arab looking men and detained some of them AFTER they found out they were here illegally I call that GOOD WORK.

Posted by Cyber Sarge 2006-06-15 10:54|| 2006-06-15 10:54|| Front Page Top

#9 99 pages? I could've summed it up in a sentence - you have no rights you are not legal cased closed, and the bill's in the mail have a nice day.

Posted by Broadhead6 2006-06-15 12:50|| 2006-06-15 12:50|| Front Page Top

#10 "a former federal prosecutor in Brooklyn who was appointed to the bench by President Clinton"

"Oh, look! I finally found a pony in the manure pile!"

Posted by Fordesque 2006-06-15 13:36|| 2006-06-15 13:36|| Front Page Top

#11 Thank you judge, for a little common sense. The system of law is stymied without common sense. Every time some idiot lawyer files these nonsense cases, they should be struck down and thrown out within 48 hours. We need a special Tribunal for Stupidity which would be dedicated to these cases.

Posted by SOP35/Rat 2006-06-15 16:58|| 2006-06-15 16:58|| Front Page Top

23:37 grb
23:37 2b
23:35 2b
23:29 2b
23:27 trailing wife
22:58 Angolung Thoter3849
22:46 Alaska Paul
22:31 mhw
22:11 crosspatch
22:09 Captain America
22:05 DarthVader
22:02 trailing wife
21:58 Zenster
21:57 Frank G
21:54 Frank G
21:51 Frank G
21:50 DMFD
21:49 AzCat
21:47 DMFD
21:46 Zenster
21:44 Frank G
21:40 Frank G
21:40 DMFD
21:39 Rob Reiner