Article

2006-08-31 International-UN-NGOs

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2006-08-31 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Yeah, use DPICM next time...

Posted by Sneagum Theremp9559 2006-08-31 00:16|| 2006-08-31 00:16|| Front Page Top

#2 One would think that might discourage future rocket attacks?

Of course Hezb does lack that key "cause & effect" gene.

Posted by 3dc 2006-08-31 00:36|| 2006-08-31 00:36|| Front Page Top

#3 imagine! The UN accusing someone else of immorality. YJCMTSU. I hope Jan's eaten alive by syphilitic pygmys

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-08-31 00:47|| 2006-08-31 00:47|| Front Page Top

#4 These morons take moral relativism into the realm of absurd perverted fantasy. FOAD, Egelund.

Posted by Zenster 2006-08-31 01:28|| 2006-08-31 01:28|| Front Page Top

#5 What's shocking and I would say completely immoral is that 90 per cent of the cluster bomb strikes occurred in the last 72 hours of the conflict when we knew there would be a resolution...

Probably because Israel was pounding them so hard, dumba$$.

Posted by gorb 2006-08-31 02:11|| 2006-08-31 02:11|| Front Page Top

#6 LOL, Frank G!

I'd say Egeland is especially reprehensible, but it's a wash at the top of the UN - Kofi, Morlock-Brown, Egeland - each is a hypocritical lying scumbag of the first order. The only thing I find remarkable, anymore, is the consistency of their transparent biased spew. No doubt every utterance is from an agreed-upon script of anti-Israel / anti-US vilification. Vulture Elites, indeed. The day we withdraw funding from these parasites will be VM (Victory for Morality) Day - True Morality.

Posted by cruiser 2006-08-31 02:31|| 2006-08-31 02:31|| Front Page Top

#7 Thge imorality rests firmly on the UN and the UN troops under it command for allowing Hezb'allah to get away with what it did right under it's noses. Israel again is tard with a brush rightfully deserved by someone else.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2006-08-31 02:41|| www.sockpuppetofdoom.com]">[www.sockpuppetofdoom.com] 2006-08-31 02:41|| Front Page Top

Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the
sinktrap. Further violations may result in
banning.

Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford 2006-08-31 07:37|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2006-08-31 07:37|| Front Page Top

#9 The UN and its pantheon of irrelevant elitist rogues have the moral clarity of dirty dish water. Whenever personal danger exists for them and their priestcraft, cut and run, is their modus operandi.

Ever the since second Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld embraced the self serving idiotarian multiculturalist pro-villian appeasenik approach completely, the UN has no true soul worth tuppence. And Kofi's gang prospered corruptively especially because of that. Yes, the UN deserve only to FOAD so that more light can potentially shine on the human situation. Bad 'medicine' is as good as any veritable poison.

Posted by Duh! 2006-08-31 08:33|| 2006-08-31 08:33|| Front Page Top

#10 I must have missed the reference to firing missiles into cities and towns with no military significance.

Posted by doc 2006-08-31 10:20|| 2006-08-31 10:20|| Front Page Top

#11 To fight a terrorist gang which does not abide by Geneva conventions for warfare, an attacked country must use only PC approved weapons.
Further suggestions are for warning all area people in advance of any bombing...say with a sign off sheet for documentation, also, frontal assaults only because we must assume the terrorist gangs don't understand evolved warfare, also, provide a team roster for all participating units to the terrorists or at least to the press before any hostilities take place.
Anything else ?

Posted by wxjames 2006-08-31 10:51|| 2006-08-31 10:51|| Front Page Top

#12 Well, just exactly how do you define 'morality', Mr. Egelund?

It's difficult to converse with someone in a meaningfull fashion when they have completely different definitions for words than you do.

Posted by mcsegeek1 2006-08-31 11:10|| 2006-08-31 11:10|| Front Page Top

#13 Well gee, Jan - according to the tenets of the "First Church of Whack The Jihadi Bastards", all's fair in war. So bite me, diplo-boy. I got yer morals hangin'...

Posted by mojo">mojo 2006-08-31 11:50|| 2006-08-31 11:50|| Front Page Top

#14 From Al-Jizz. Whodda thunk it?
Okay, Jan. Next time they'll just use napalm just to keep you happy...

Posted by tu3031 2006-08-31 14:29|| 2006-08-31 14:29|| Front Page Top

#15 Egeland said he would launch an appeal for more money for mine clearance when he attends Thursday's conference in Stockholm on Lebanon's reconstruction.

Ummmmmmmmm, Jan? Fuck you.

Posted by tu3031 2006-08-31 14:31|| 2006-08-31 14:31|| Front Page Top

#16 I hope Jan's eaten alive by syphilitic pygmys

Dude, that's harsh! Those syphilitic pygmys are probably the offspring of UN Peacekeepers.

Note: Even though we are talking 'shocking and immoral', good taste prevents me from mentioning yesterday's story about UN penises injured while engaged in attempted goat boinking.

OK, I'm done. Cue the pygmys.

Posted by SteveS 2006-08-31 15:05|| 2006-08-31 15:05|| Front Page Top

#17 OK, I'm done. Cue the pygmys.
A keeper refering to a keeper.

A keeper.

Posted by 6 2006-08-31 17:50|| 2006-08-31 17:50|| Front Page Top

#18 Of course, the marvelous Egeland doesn't mention the fact that during those last 72 hours of the conflict, Hezbollah fired an unprecedentend amount of rockets on Israel, and that Israel was thus only retaliating.

But we know that, for the UN, the Jews, and them solely, have never the right to retaliate to anything.

Posted by leroidavid">leroidavid 2006-08-31 19:21|| 2006-08-31 19:21|| Front Page Top

#19 "In the last 72 hours of the conflict when [Israel] knew there would be an end" (Jan Egeland)

Usually, in any cartesian world, a war is fought till the end of this war. But now, the UN is saying that, 72 hours before the end of this war, Israel shouldn't have used weapons, because she knew that there would be an end to this war; - but 144 hours before the end of this war, Israel shouldn't have used weapons, because she knew that 72 hours after this moment, she would have known that there would be an end to this war; - and 216 hours before the end of this war (...); - and 288 hours before (...); - so, in fact, at the very beginning of this war, Israel shouldn't have used weapons at all.

For the UN, Israel (and the Jews) has no right to use weapons.

That is reminiscent of Warsaw's ghetto , when the nazis accused the Jews, who were fighting back, of using weapons...

Posted by leroidavid">leroidavid 2006-08-31 19:38|| 2006-08-31 19:38|| Front Page Top

#20 Oh, by the way, I am told that the Jews are breathing. Is this immoral too, Mr Egelund?

Posted by leroidavid">leroidavid 2006-08-31 19:40|| 2006-08-31 19:40|| Front Page Top

#21 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]

Posted by Rob Crawford 2006-08-31 07:37|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2006-08-31 07:37|| Front Page Top

07:37 Rob Crawford
23:41 twobyfour
23:41 Frank G
23:40 J. D. Lux
23:32 CrazyFool
23:30 Thoth
23:29 J. D. Lux
23:29 ed
23:27 Barbara Skolaut
23:25 twobyfour
23:23 Zenster
23:21 J. D. Lux
23:20 Zenster
23:19 Barbara Skolaut
23:16 Frank G
23:15 Zenster
23:11 Zenster
23:09 Zenster
23:07 Zenster
23:04 Zenster
23:02 trailing wife
23:00 Frank G
23:00 Dreadnought
22:58 Zenster