Article

2006-10-02 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2006-10-02 03:22|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 For those with some knowledge of Mr Rumsfeld's working habits, it also comes as a surprise. He has a reputation for encouraging reasoned debate among his subordinates ~~but not with him or his inner circle.~~
Rubbish!

Posted by Besoeker 2006-10-02 07:30|| 2006-10-02 07:30|| Front Page Top

#2 So you know him personally Besoeker and not the crap that comes filtered from MSM?

My read on history is that effective reform in a military establishment occurs when it either (a) loses a war [i.e. WWI>Germans, Vietnam>Americans] or (b) has a leadership purge [i.e. French Revolutionary Army]. The military of the 90s was stilled anchored on a strategy of a massive European land based war with the Soviet Union and damn slow and resistant to evolution. It was going to hurt a lot of egos and personal pets of the General Officer corps to make the change. Character assassination is a long and fine tradition from the time of the Roman Republic.

It was Alexander and Fredricks fathers who built the armies they won with. It was Carnot that put together the army Napoleon would fight with. Notice how the builders get little credit for laying the foundation which served the names of history well. You are witnessing the transition of a military force that is suited not just for fighting a war effectively and efficiently, but one that has to operate within the political, cultural, and economic parameters of the American Republic. Lots of toes and personal empires are being bruised.

Is he perfect. Hell, no. I find both Rumsfeld and the GOs at fault for outsourcing the reporting of the war. Rummy because he has enough on his plate, but the attitude of the GOs is that they dont want to be bothered by it, is a clear demonstration of the narrow vision that the suits have. They are still protecting their turf and control over their environment and dont want to have to deal with winning anything outside of the battlefield. Youd think theyd learned from Vietnam, that you can win all the battles, but still lose the war. See, its another aspect that has yet been reformed in the military culture. Maybe they have to give up some of their resouces to compete with the enemy and their allies in 'winning the hearts and minds' back home. There is still much work to be done and egos to be bruised.

Posted by Glitle Grenter4308 2006-10-02 09:20|| 2006-10-02 09:20|| Front Page Top

#3 No Grenter, I don't play golf with him and nothing I've said comes from the MSM.

Posted by Besoeker 2006-10-02 09:30|| 2006-10-02 09:30|| Front Page Top

#4 Classic graphic there.

Posted by Angie Schultz 2006-10-02 11:29|| 2006-10-02 11:29|| Front Page Top

#5 Is he perfect. Hell, no. I find both Rumsfeld and the GOs at fault for outsourcing the reporting of the war. Rummy because he has enough on his plate, but the attitude of the GOs is that they dont want to be bothered by it, is a clear demonstration of the narrow vision that the suits have. They are still protecting their turf and control over their environment and dont want to have to deal with winning anything outside of the battlefield. Youd think theyd learned from Vietnam, that you can win all the battles, but still lose the war. See, its another aspect that has yet been reformed in the military culture. Maybe they have to give up some of their resouces to compete with the enemy and their allies in 'winning the hearts and minds' back home. There is still much work to be done and egos to be bruised.

Part of that is simply that we didn't think we were the sort of nation that needed a line in the federal budget for "convincing the American people that supporting the country is a good idea."

Posted by Phil 2006-10-02 11:51|| 2006-10-02 11:51|| Front Page Top

#6 It was Carnot that put together the army Napoleon would fight with.

Actually it was Gribeauval well before the revolution who made French artillery the best in world. I am not sure but he could have also improved artillery schools. One of them was soon to have a pupil called Buonaparte.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2006-10-02 11:59|| 2006-10-02 11:59|| Front Page Top

#7 I like Rumsfield but thing he's wrong on troop numbers. I don't mean the number of feet on the groun in Iraq but the number of feet available for rotations so the same guys don't go back every other year. After SEPT 11 we should have bumped up the numbers, and pulled troops out of Germany/Korea to ensure flexibility.

Posted by rjschwarz 2006-10-02 14:21|| 2006-10-02 14:21|| Front Page Top

#8 "gliberal" - hahaha, great term. I will be procuring that for future.

Posted by Broadhead6 2006-10-02 14:57|| 2006-10-02 14:57|| Front Page Top

#9 Part of that is simply that we didn't think we were the sort of nation that needed a line in the federal budget for "convincing the American people that supporting the country is a good idea."

Actually done directly or indirectly during WWI and WWII. Notice something missing in the news since then?

Posted by Gling Whamp5942 2006-10-02 15:55|| 2006-10-02 15:55|| Front Page Top

#10 Wartime rationing, tires, sugar, etc. The postponement of vehicle manufacturing from 1942-1946, termination of professional sports (such as they were back then). All served as reminders of the greater task at hand, that of Victory and the defeat and destuction of the Axis powers.

Posted by Besoeker 2006-10-02 16:07|| 2006-10-02 16:07|| Front Page Top

#11 US should have worked with the INC (even if they are crooks) to take over the country as we did in Afghanistan. We should have then set up a series of firebases along the borders to ensure no infilitration and to allow the Iraqi's to take care of their own internal problems.

Thing is, I believe, the goal was not necessarily Iraqi stability as much as a flypaper strategy designed to draw jihadists from Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iran into Iraq where we could kill them. This requires an open border and somewhat exposed troops, as well as alot of nightmarish crap from the "loyal opposition". But it is better than invading a half dozen countries.

The Germans are pussies these days because we culled a generation of the more fanatical types. I believe we are doing the same in Arabia but we are letting the herd self-select. Those that choose to come and die can, the rest will be left in peace.

Posted by rjschwarz 2006-10-02 17:44|| 2006-10-02 17:44|| Front Page Top

#12 I would suggest that we have missed a bet to a greater extent in Afghanistan, and a lesser one in Iraq. That being, despite sobbing criticism, we should have imposed *our* western system of government on them from the outset. American style, *not* European style.

It was a mistake we also made after WWII with Europe, encouraging them to adopt Social Democrat governments and, even worse, retain the Roman Law and Code Napoleon Law; both of which has been to their ruination ever since.

Bluntly, we should have imposed *our* form of government, not a European parlimentarian style of government, and re-ordered their entire nation to have Common Law, rather than that wretched excuse for law they have. And this applies to all situations. Europe, Iraq and Afghanistan.

No Jurgas. Absolutely NO possibility of Sharia. NO religion in government at all for that matter. Equal rights for women. Free enterprise and small business with little or no government interference. Even make their parlimentarians wear business suits, not dresses.

By utterly re-arranging their shiat, they are forced to see an example of the BEST of what works. To see a truly efficient government in operation. To see equality of opportunity. To see what a modern nation, with a good system of laws, can be.

Then, after even a few years, when we pack up and leave, see if any but utter fanatics want to change back.

McArthur did it for Japan, and boy did it work.

So why were we so pissed off at Europe that we ruined them with socialism and welfare statism? Did we dump on them because they were white?

And by "us", I mean the democrat party that wanted them to be that way. They saw the Japanese as inferior, so ironically let Mac do what he saw fit.

And it was a godsend to them.

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-10-02 21:42|| 2006-10-02 21:42|| Front Page Top

#13 So why were we so pissed off at Europe that we ruined them with socialism and welfare statism?

I'm currently re-reading Cornelius Ryan's "The Last Battle". Once again, I see parallels with Vietnam and also the current war. During WWII, we fought to destroy the enemy's warfighting capability, leaving politics to the politicians after the war was won. To the Europeans, politics was first and destroying the enemy was second. Many of the attacks, feints, and other military actions of the British, Free French, etc., were ment for symbolism, rather than the destruction of the enemy. They were to "improve morale", "send a message", etc., the same multicultural crap we hear today. The British are more responsible for the current German form of government than the United States, and the German government looks more like the British government than that of the US. The same can be said of the Iraqi government. Just as Iraq was a creation of the British, so is their "form" of government. The only difference is that for the last 50+ years, it's been run as a dictatorship of one group or another. The basic form, however, is still British parlaimentarianism.

Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot 2006-10-02 22:46|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/] 2006-10-02 22:46|| Front Page Top

#14 My 2 cents. Even if numbers (US & Co soldiers) were doubled or tripled, it still wouldn't work. Can't make silk purses out of sows' ears.

Posted by gromgoru 2006-10-02 23:45|| 2006-10-02 23:45|| Front Page Top

19:42 Mullah
19:29 custer
23:59 Zenster
23:56 Zenster
23:54 gromgoru
23:50 tipper
23:45 gromgoru
23:42 trailing wife
23:40 Zenster
23:35 trailing wife
23:30 3dc
23:27 Super Hose
23:26 RJB in JC MO
23:21 Captain America
23:19 Captain America
23:16 Zenster
23:12 3dc
23:11 Super Hose
23:08 trailing wife
22:57 trailing wife
22:54 trailing wife
22:49 trailing wife
22:46 Old Patriot
22:42 trailing wife