Article

2006-11-04 Home Front: Politix

Why the Democrats probably wont win, even though it seems like their turn

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-11-04 09:41|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 This can be expressed in psychological terms. The republicans are doing well because they focus on sanity, reason, organization and strategy. This works far better than the democrats haphazard attempts to emotionally stimulate the crowd of the minute with the emotionalism of the minute.

The republicans might say that since they stand for things, they have root beliefs that are unchanging, they can plan months or years ahead, using these as axioms.

But the democrats are philosophically vitiated; they not only stand for nothing, but they abhor standing for anything. While this is a position of opposition, it does not proactively lead to anything. It is not a plan.

In fact, is there anyone out there at all who can claim knowledge of what the democrat party stands for? Every stance is qualified, even a retreat from Iraq and the War on Terror. They have no guiding force behind them.

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-11-04 11:34|| 2006-11-04 11:34|| Front Page Top

#2 It's just like one can't figure why the socialist/commie LINKTV has most of its shows either on muslims or BDS.

WTF do muzzies have to do with the communist dream state?

They would eat commies for lunch and use the tuti-fruits from SanFran/Berkley for toliet paper.

Posted by 3dc 2006-11-04 13:26|| 2006-11-04 13:26|| Front Page Top

#3 "is there anyone out there at all who can claim knowledge of what the democrat party stands for?"

Sure.

They stand for winning by using any trick in the book. They stand for season tickets at the 50 yd line for Redskins games. They stand for unending cocktail parties hosted by lobbyists. They stand for enjoying all the perks of power for the "annointed ones".

Policies? We don't need no stinking policies!

Al

Posted by frozen al">frozen al 2006-11-04 18:11|| 2006-11-04 18:11|| Front Page Top

#4 Policies? We don't need no stinking policies!

LOL! That's about right!

Posted by anon 2006-11-04 21:47|| 2006-11-04 21:47|| Front Page Top

#5 CARVILLE [paraphrased] > iff the Dems can't win even despite the seeming current probs-weaknesses of the GOP + Dubya, the entire premise-agenda-rationale for existence of the Democratic Party will have to be reviewed, re-evaluated, + reconsidered, or words to that effect. IMO, IOW the Dems/DemoLefties need a PC alibi-excuse to become the full-fledged SOCIALIST PARTY USA and later the CPUSA. Hated Despicable Nazi Fascist America = Well-meaning but Errorful Limited Commie Amerika will still have to surrender like WW2 VICHY PARIS to OWG, Global Socialism, + espec Mackinder's World Island aka OOOOOOOPPPPSIES RUSSIA-CHINA. Iff AMerika don't, 'tis still war agz America anytime after Year 2014 [China] - Year 2018 [Russia].

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-11-04 22:47|| 2006-11-04 22:47|| Front Page Top

17:17 Contrarian
23:58 C-Low
23:46 Sherry
23:34 Zenster
23:23 Old Patriot
23:21 anon
23:04 JosephMendiola
22:59 JosephMendiola
22:58 Old Patriot
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:47 JosephMendiola
22:45 Zenster
22:44 anymouse
22:37 Mike
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:34 Zenster
22:26 Korora
22:26 USN,Ret
22:23 JosephMendiola
22:22 Zenster
22:18 Frank G
22:16 SpecOp35
22:15 Pappy
22:13 USN,Ret