Article

2006-12-09 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2006-12-09 01:15|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 We've come a long way from that day ... when President Ronald Reagan

Ordered US withdrawl from Lebanon?

Posted by gromgoru 2006-12-09 04:55|| 2006-12-09 04:55|| Front Page Top

#2 Like Animal House - don't stop him, he's on a roll.

Posted by Thinese Slugum3677 2006-12-09 06:56|| 2006-12-09 06:56|| Front Page Top

#3 Gromgoro, that was my thought as well but someone on another board said that the Congress was behind the pullout of Lebanon. I don't know the facts but the retreat didn't help and Iran/Contra certainly didn't send a very good message either.

Posted by rjschwarz 2006-12-09 12:24|| 2006-12-09 12:24|| Front Page Top

#4 From the Democrats own archives:

Advised by Jim Baker, Saudi Princes Seek Immunity Against 9/11 Lawsuits
18-Oct-03
September 11 Lawsuits

CNN reports, "Lawyers representing two Saudi princes argued Friday that their clients have immunity from lawsuits relating to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, because they are diplomatic officials... Bill Jeffress [of Jim Baker's firm Baker Botts], representing Prince Sultan, said that the contributions made to Islamic charities that may have funneled money to bin Laden amount to 'an exercise by a foreign official of discretion to decide which international Islamic charity and what relief operations by Islamic organizations the country's going to support.' Ron Motley, lead attorney in the case against the Saudis, said the Saudi government and the two princes were told at least three times by U.S. and French officials that their contributions were funding terrorism. 'They were told that the very charities they were giving millions of dollars to every year were converting that money to terrorist activities including al Qaeda.'" 9/11 victims seek $1 TRILLION in damages.

LINK

Posted by 3dc 2006-12-09 12:39|| 2006-12-09 12:39|| Front Page Top

#5 Fascinating. This is the second big op-ed piece in the Investor's Business Daily that's saying all the right things. What's going on over there?

Posted by trailing wife 2006-12-09 15:32|| 2006-12-09 15:32|| Front Page Top

#6 Bombing at 5:00 p.m.

Posted by JohnQC 2006-12-09 16:54|| 2006-12-09 16:54|| Front Page Top

23:59 Zenster
23:52 gromgoru
23:37 borgboy
23:32 gorb
23:31 USN,Ret
23:30 Zenster
23:25 Zenster
23:23 trailing wife
23:18 Zenster
23:17 Zenster
23:16 badanov
23:15 Whiskey Mike
23:14 Zenster
23:14 mrp
23:08 trailing wife
22:47 trailing wife
22:45 BA
22:42 Thoth
22:37 gorb
22:37 BA
22:36 BA
22:30 Barbara Skolaut
22:30 trailing wife
22:14 Atomic Conspiracy