Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 03/15/2007 View Wed 03/14/2007 View Tue 03/13/2007 View Mon 03/12/2007 View Sat 03/10/2007 View Fri 03/09/2007 View Thu 03/08/2007
1
2007-03-15 Fifth Column
Lawyer for Flying Imans targets John & Jane Doe
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by mhw 2007-03-15 11:12|| || Front Page|| [8 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1  Targeting private individuals who do anything to bring any form of unfavorable attention to Muslims is a form of Lawfare, and needs to be quashed right away.
See SLAPP in wikipedia for starters:
A Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation ("SLAPP") is a form of litigation filed by a large organization or in some cases an individual plaintiff, to intimidate and silence a less powerful critic by so severely burdening them with the cost of a legal defense that they abandon their criticism.

In this case, it's a legal maneuver to strike terror in everyday people (like us) so they will be less and less willing to do anything to resist the jihad.
California enacted Code of Civil Procedure ยง 425.16 in 1992, a statute intended to prevent the misuse of litigation in SLAPP suits. It provides for a special motion which a defendant can file at the outset of a lawsuit to strike a complaint where the complaint arises from conduct that falls within the rights of petition or free speech...It also applies to speech in a public forum about an issue of public interest and to any other petition or speech conduct about an issue of public interest.

The filing of an anti-SLAPP motion prevents the plaintiff from amending the complaint and stays all discovery. If the special motion is denied, the filing of an appeal immediately stays the trial court proceedings as to each challenged cause of action.

I don't know which court has jurisdiction in this case, or what (if anything) can be done about it. Some input from 'Burgers with legal background needed here. Could any customer of US Airway file a court petition to quash this ridiculous maneuver NOW?
This action is significant for US infidels right now.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2007-03-15 13:12||   2007-03-15 13:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Anguper

You have a point. However, this lawsuit looks to be a major public affairs disaster for the Jihad and thus from that standpoint, quashing may not be a good idea.
Posted by mhw 2007-03-15 14:29|| http://hypocrisy-incorporated.blogspot.com/]">[http://hypocrisy-incorporated.blogspot.com/]  2007-03-15 14:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Wouldn't it be great if the judge sat through the whole thing then tossed it out and ordered cair to pay the defendant's legal fees?
Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek  2007-03-15 16:51||   2007-03-15 16:51|| Front Page Top

23:52 anonaminie
23:52 Bunyip
23:28 Eric Jablow
23:25 Verlaine
23:24 gromgoru
23:23 Verlaine
23:19 gromgoru
23:18 Verlaine
23:18 Frank G
23:10 Verlaine
23:07 RD
23:07 anon1
23:04 Verlaine
23:01 twobyfour
22:58 anon1
22:57 Alaska Paul
22:56 Danking70
22:55 Verlaine
22:37 Zenster
22:35 twobyfour
22:35 anon1
22:35 Chuck Simmins
22:32 anon1
22:18 gromgoru









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com