Article

2007-04-20 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Frank G 2007-04-20 07:36|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Isn't this the same guy who refused to meet with General Petraeus who was going to brief the Congress on how the war is really going?

Posted by WTF 2007-04-20 07:56|| 2007-04-20 07:56|| Front Page Top

#2 Yeah, but Petreuses peeps couldn't guarantee he would stick to Harrys talking points.

Posted by Capsu78 2007-04-20 08:43|| 2007-04-20 08:43|| Front Page Top

#3 Harry Reid sucks pig dick.

Posted by tu3031 2007-04-20 08:49|| 2007-04-20 08:49|| Front Page Top

#4 "This war is lost"

Statement of a loser--A complete loser. This guy makes the hair on my neck stand every time I hear him utter some drively nonsense. What a political animal. These losers get elected. What is the brain dead process that is used by voters?

Posted by JohnQC 2007-04-20 09:15|| 2007-04-20 09:15|| Front Page Top

#5 There should be a picture of Paris in the background, not DC. Reid is more French than American.

Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan 2007-04-20 10:31|| 2007-04-20 10:31|| Front Page Top

#6 Since Reid is OWNED by the Nevada Gambling folk - I assume they just want the big spending Saudis back so they OK'ed his looser message.

After all, he was their chief laywer!

Posted by 3dc 2007-04-20 11:16|| 2007-04-20 11:16|| Front Page Top

#7 Remember Senator. If you cause the troops to come back in defeat again, they just might be angry enough to enable "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." clause of their oath.

We are watching you, scumbag.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2007-04-20 11:45|| 2007-04-20 11:45|| Front Page Top

#8 Aside from the naked political calculation that a loss in the war equals a victory for the Democrats, I can only conclude this stuff is the result of a psychopathology. These are the guys who pay for fat women in spiked heels to trample them in their offices. Not that there is anything wrong with that but it is no way to conduct foreign policy let alone a war.

Posted by Excalibur 2007-04-20 11:54|| 2007-04-20 11:54|| Front Page Top

#9 Petraeus should state in his meetings that the war is definetely not lost and that these kind of pronouncements before even being briefed by the General are not helpful to the soldiers in the field.

Posted by danking_70 2007-04-20 12:36|| 2007-04-20 12:36|| Front Page Top

#10 Reid and the rest of the loser dhemmicrats are vested in the war being lost. However, they do not have the balls to pull funding from the troops with 2008 elections coming up. They just want the current administration to suffer a death by a thousand cuts while risking nothing.

Posted by JohnQC 2007-04-20 13:01|| 2007-04-20 13:01|| Front Page Top

#11 This guy is the Lord Haw Haw of modern times. William Joyce (one of the Lord Haw Haws) was executed for treason. Can Reid at least be impeached? Is there not some law against being an idiot?

Posted by JohnQC 2007-04-20 13:14|| 2007-04-20 13:14|| Front Page Top

#12 JohnQC -

NRS 306.020 Public officers subject to recall from office; contents of petition for recall.

1. Every public officer in the State of Nevada is subject to recall from office by the registered voters of the State or of the county, district or municipality from which he was elected, as provided in Section 9 of Article 2 of the Constitution of the State of Nevada and this chapter. A public officer who is appointed to an elective office is subject to recall in the same manner as provided for an officer who is elected to that office.

2. The petition must, in addition to setting forth the reason why the recall is demanded:

(a) Contain the residence addresses of the signers and the date that the petition was signed;

(b) Contain a statement of the minimum number of signatures necessary to the validity of the petition;

(c) Contain at the top of each page and immediately above the signature line, in at least 10-point bold type, the words Recall Petition;

(d) Include the date that a notice of intent was filed; and

(e) Have the designation: Signatures of registered voters seeking the recall of ................ (name of public officer for whom recall is sought) on each page if the petition contains more than one page.

(Added to NRS by 1960, 282; A 1963, 1385; 1969, 197; 1971, 159; 1975, 1166; 1981, 22; 1987, 698; 1989, 1062)

Posted by Procopius2k 2007-04-20 18:02|| 2007-04-20 18:02|| Front Page Top

23:50 JosephMendiola
23:45 RD
23:34 trailing wife
23:33 Zenster
23:30 Zenster
23:30 RWV
23:28 RD
23:22 RWV
23:19 JosephMendiola
23:10 Frank G
23:03 RD
22:57 USN, ret.
22:55 Frank G
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:50 Ho Chi Snusoper4439
22:49 RD
22:44 Grunter
22:39 JosephMendiola
22:36 Anonymoose
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:24 RD
22:20 Zenster
22:20 KBK
22:18 Zenster