Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/23/2007 View Tue 05/22/2007 View Mon 05/21/2007 View Sun 05/20/2007 View Sat 05/19/2007 View Fri 05/18/2007 View Thu 05/17/2007
1
2007-05-23 Britain
Cameron: We have a year to tackle Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Pappy 2007-05-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 But he stressed the drawbacks, saying that "Iran having a nuclear weapon would be calamity but military action could be calamitous".

Quit mincing about you deficient pusillanimous git! How could any military action be remotely as "calamitous" as the mad mullahs acquiring nuclear weapons?

But the measures suggested by Mr Cameron would take years to impose real costs on Iran.

In other words: Non-military measures are certain to be ineffective. Perish the thought that they might have to admit such a thing to themselves. Heaven forfend that America might actually be right. [gasp]
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-05-23 02:23||   2007-05-23 02:23|| Front Page Top

#2 You know, sometimes things are simpler that they seem on the surface. Of course, an awesome military strike is, ..., eh, awesome, and usually discouraging to the recipient to pull off further shit. But if there's no will for that, how about some Rod from God? Or about as many as neded to reduce the Natanz centrifuge facility to smithereens. Probably 5-10 could do it.
Posted by twobyfour 2007-05-23 02:46||   2007-05-23 02:46|| Front Page Top

#3 David Cameron knows all he has to do is just talk big and sit back, in his 'Catbird Seat' while Israel stews over it's options in the near future. The Brits are indeed 'poodles' top down, And I take any pronouncements out of that nation, with a grain of salt. Lets just see how many brits go to Israel to help the valiant country ward off the 'dogs of war'. Yea...I thought so!
Posted by smn 2007-05-23 05:55||   2007-05-23 05:55|| Front Page Top

#4 You have one option - military intervention - that "could" be calamitous (15-35%), and another option that is 100% guaranteed to be calamitous. Yet using the first option to prevent the second option is considered "unacceptable". YJCMTSU - these people are total idiots. Unless something drastic happens, the West will slowly crumble, like the Roman empire, and for the same reason - the inability to make hard decisions and stand by them (spilling blood and treasure to ensure a future for our children). They're not traitors - that's being too nice to them. They are mindless jellyfish, unable to do anything but be carried along by the waves of self-generated "wisdom".
Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot  2007-05-23 15:17|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]  2007-05-23 15:17|| Front Page Top

23:50 trailing wife
23:49 Mark Espinola
23:48 Zenster
23:45 Mark Espinola
23:43 DMFD
23:43 WTF
23:42 Zenster
23:30 anonymous2u
23:26 DMFD
23:24 Danking70
22:50 Angie Schultz
22:49 Mac
22:47 Shieldwolf
22:45 Mac
22:44 Mac
22:36 DMFD
22:33 DMFD
22:32 DMFD
22:31 SR-71
22:21 George Orwell
22:19 George Orwell
22:08 ed
22:04 Anonymoose
22:00 George Orwell









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com