Article

2007-06-16 Science & Technology

Human DNA much more complicated then expected.

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by 3dc 2007-06-16 03:39|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 Translation: The overlap during the transcription process indicates that there are several levels of encoding. The long repeating sequences (formerly deemed junk) may serve as a key (or keys) to decode other layers. Thus what may seem a simple sequence may be decoded in numerous ways, depending what is the actual position on the overlap that reading starts from.

Lt's look a little closer. Imagine the DNA as a rope that is twisted from many strands (or rather loops which are then separated wrapped into chromosomes). This rope is again tightly packed, and held together with short strands of RNA that tie up several 'ropes' together. The tRNA that is usually specific to a certain code sequence approaches the packed DNA and unwraps a loop that is supposed to read, a little bit more of it as we learned above. It then acquires single amino acids from the cellular fluid and chains them according to the code (a mirror image). Somehow, it knows (I don't have a better word to describe it) where to look and how to call the singletons up. This is going at speed that if you could scale the nucleus up so you could see the process clearly, you would be enveloped in a 1000 mph whirlwind.

Amazing, innit?

Posted by twobyfour 2007-06-16 04:51|| 2007-06-16 04:51|| Front Page Top

#2 Wow. What's next?

Posted by gorb 2007-06-16 06:21|| 2007-06-16 06:21|| Front Page Top

#3 God and the Scientist

God is sitting in Heaven when a scientist says to
Him, "Lord, we don't need you anymore. Science has
finally figured out a way to create life out of
nothing.

In other words, we can now do what you did in the 'beginning'

"Oh, is that so? Tell me..." replies God.

"Well",says the scientist, "we can take dirt and
form it into the likeness of you and breathe life
into it, thus creating man."

"Well, that's interesting. Show Me."

So the scientist bends down to the earth and starts
to mold the soil.

"Oh no, no, no ..." interrupts God,

I love this part)

"Get your own dirt."

Posted by BrerRabbit 2007-06-16 07:38|| 2007-06-16 07:38|| Front Page Top

#4 I second what 2x4 said.

Posted by HalfEmpty">HalfEmpty 2007-06-16 09:08|| 2007-06-16 09:08|| Front Page Top

#5 Without wishing to sound unimpressed (which I'm not), what else should we expect from several million years of evolution? I'm especially interested by their reassessment of "junk" DNA. While long intervals between vital coding sequences confers a degree of protection from ionizing radiation, nature usually doesn't lavish a lot of effort for no reason at all. This is especially so in light of how DNA remains a pinnacle of compact and concise information storage.

The consortium identified many previously unrecognized start sites for transcription and new regulatory sequences that contrary to traditional views are located not only upstream but also downstream of transcription start sites.

This isn't the huge surprise that it might seem to be. I would regard the downstream transcription start sites as "backup files" of these vital macros.

But about half of the functional elements in the human genome do not appear to have been constrained during evolution, suggesting that many species' genomes contain a pool of functional elements that provide no specific benefits in terms of survival or reproduction.

Again, not such a big shocker and they may well be wrong about how these functional elements "provide no specific benefits". A large library always provides more value even if a given individual does not read all of the books contained therein. Similarly, a large DNA catalogue of functional elements makes available many more viable mutations (read: adaptations) which can prove quite valuable if environmental conditions change downstream.

All together, much as I would expect but still extremely cool.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-06-16 16:30|| 2007-06-16 16:30|| Front Page Top

#6 nature usually doesn't lavish a lot of effort for no reason at all

Zen, are you going metaphysical on us?

I don't have any religion, as opposed to you, I just observe. ;-)

Posted by twobyfour 2007-06-16 16:58|| 2007-06-16 16:58|| Front Page Top

23:51 twobyfour
23:44 Pappy
23:43 FOTSGreg
23:41 USN, ret.
23:36 FOTSGreg
23:35 Frank G
23:35 Mike N.
23:34 Frank G
23:22 ryuge
23:21 Mike N.
23:21 Zenster
23:20 USN, ret.
23:18 badanov
23:03 Frank G
23:02 Steve
22:57 USN, ret.
22:42 twobyfour
22:41 Zenster
22:38 Zhang Fei
22:38 Phineter Thraviger
22:35 Barbara Skolaut
22:33 Barbara Skolaut
22:32 Zenster
22:32 Natural Law