Article

2007-07-24 Home Front: Culture Wars

$21 Million Awarded for 'Wrongful Birth'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by ryuge 2007-07-24 00:09|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 If you've got an toddler with SLOS like symptoms, birth defects, constant care, etc, something tells me the parents share some type of responsibility in finding out what the problem is, ie, getting a second or third opinion, before having a second child.

Hey Amara, ya think we outta do this again do ya? Yea Danny, no pesos for the first one, no diagnosis, Christian says "its a ticket to ride and we'll be millionaires!"

Posted by Besoeker 2007-07-24 06:31|| 2007-07-24 06:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Would their HMO pay for the second opinion?

Posted by gromky 2007-07-24 07:33|| 2007-07-24 07:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Searcy said he would push state lawmakers to pass a bill awarding the Estradas money over the $200,000 cap

Look for a bigger payout for your work? That's why the cap. The 'people' got tired of torte lawyers who played for the payoff. Think you can bribe enough state legislatives? Wouldn't that be a kick-back? Not that it should bother a lawyer.

Posted by Procopius2k 2007-07-24 10:08|| 2007-07-24 10:08|| Front Page Top

#4 And people wonder why medical costs have gone through the roof.

Its lawsuits liek this and the threat of them that force "defensive medicine" (which is costly as wasteful), and drive up the cost of medical treatment for everyone. Not to mention driving good people away from the field

Posted by OldSpook 2007-07-24 11:27|| 2007-07-24 11:27|| Front Page Top

#5 which is the inability to correctly produce or synthesize cholesterol, after his 2002 birth

I'm no doctor, but this doesn't seem (at least to me) to be as "severe" a birth defect as the AP scare lines would indicate. Isn't their some form (for children) of Plavix or something, or is that too simple?

Even with that, I can't imagine this is that bad a disease to 'monitor' compared to other severe birth defects. I'd assume that it's a matter of watching his/her diet and keeping some drugs on hand, not exactly worth $21 million.

Kousseff, a specialist in genetic disorders, told them they should be able to have normal children in the future.

If that's (literally) what he said, that's probably completely true. If you take it literally, he's just saying it's very possible they could have a second child that's "normal." Of course, that also means there's a chance the 2nd child has the same defect too. I feel for them as parents, but good grief, this free-wheelin' gravy train has gotta stop somewhere.

Posted by BA 2007-07-24 13:46|| 2007-07-24 13:46|| Front Page Top

#6 This one is ugly, and far beyond mere dietary adjustments, based on a quick search. SLO Foundation Pure Mendelian recessive, so if one child is born with it, the odds are one in four that any subsequent child will also suffer, and 50% that it will be a carrier, as are both parents. It's apparently one of the most common autosomal recessive disorders that I'd never heard of, with an estimated one in 20,000 occurrence in the West. Mental retardation with multiple birth defects, failure to thrive, and unlikelihood of ever achieving independent living as adults and, according to an study last year in the American Journal of Medical Genetics (entitled, amusingly, "DHCR7 mutation carrier rates and prevalence of the RSH/Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: where are the patients?") is likely a cause of a great many miscarriages and early infant deaths. The cause -- inability to produce cholesterol -- was only discovered in 1993, with a lab test and DNA test following thereafter.

It sounds like Professor Dr. Kousseff misdiagnosed the first child. Fair enough -- it took a small team of doctors three plus years to figure out the cause of my chronic fatigue because it wasn't any of the things they're accustomed to looking for... and another year to conclude that the Hail Mary treatment prescribed not only works but is critical, again because it's not something anyone was accustomed to consider.

I understand the frustration, anguish and increasing desperation that led the parents to sue, but unfortunately they got caught in temporal reality.

Posted by trailing wife 2007-07-24 21:09|| 2007-07-24 21:09|| Front Page Top

23:30 JustAboutEnough
23:26 Anonymoose
23:17 StumpRanchSteve
23:02 RD
22:58 Eric Jablow
22:57 Zenster
22:52 twobyfour
22:51 Eric Jablow
22:46 RD
22:45 Eric Jablow
22:38 Delphi
22:22 Zhang Fei
22:20 Lone Ranger
22:12 Mike
22:05 RWV
22:03 RWV
21:59 Bunyip
21:48 Deacon Blues
21:39 Zenster
21:36 trailing wife
21:32 trailing wife
21:26 lotp
21:23 sinse
21:20 sinse