Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 11/01/2007 View Wed 10/31/2007 View Tue 10/30/2007 View Mon 10/29/2007 View Sun 10/28/2007 View Sat 10/27/2007 View Fri 10/26/2007
1
2007-11-01 Iraq
Yemen & Turkey: First "Walkaways" Under Assumed U.S. Retreat
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2007-11-01 12:16|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 This stems from the perception of defeat; and who created that perception of defeat, even while the fight was on, and mostly one-sided (though that Nation-building thing was/is based on pretty optimistic view of iraqis' capacity for democracy)? The Usual Suspects and their mass-media machinery.
I wonder, how any western country is to ever fight again a successful war (not just militarly, but as a whole)? There always were oppositions to wars, sometimes even very violent (Us civil war draft riots) or massive (US anti-WWI demonstrations), but they were crushed by an able power, and they didn't have the means to mold the opinions of millions.
Since the Indochina war, and in every conflict since then, there always was a part of the western public opinion that was not only opposed to the war, but actively on the other side, and that include the Enlightened Elites and the msm. With that, and until deep changes, I don't see any possible victory, with such a divide.
Posted by anonymous5089 2007-11-01 13:29||   2007-11-01 13:29|| Front Page Top

#2 Thank you, Harry Reid.
Posted by Mike 2007-11-01 13:33||   2007-11-01 13:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Saddam bet on the MSM and the 'usual' suspects too. Look where it got him. Those outside don't understand that in our system there's a lot of posturing and ritual to the entire process. Not a whole lot different than when the Romans would consult the oracles before setting out on a course of action. It's cultural theater and show to a great extent. The 'signs' may be inauspicious, but that only means a delay in the game, not the final outcome. They're just waiting to find the sacred chicken with the clean liver. They will eventually. Unfortunately, those on the outside confuse the ritual with the actual and inevitable outcome. Check the record on the outcome, not the process. Then place your bets.
Posted by Procopius2k 2007-11-01 13:42||   2007-11-01 13:42|| Front Page Top

#4 Why do I feel that isnt's any loss.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2007-11-01 14:39||   2007-11-01 14:39|| Front Page Top

#5 Why do I feel that this is not really a loss?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2007-11-01 14:40||   2007-11-01 14:40|| Front Page Top

#6 I think its a mistake to conflate the situation in Yemen with that in Turkey. Whether the US remains an influence in the region or not, the recent status quo wrt the PKK is clearly intolerable to Turkey (and IIUC the death count far higher recently than the Israel death count from Pal terrorism).
Posted by Liberalhawk 2007-11-01 16:08||   2007-11-01 16:08|| Front Page Top

#7 "Saddam bet on the MSM and the 'usual' suspects too. Look where it got him."

True. But he was betting against a very different America than the one that's evolved since his overthrow.

Whether Arab leaders' assumption that "the next two or three years will bring a American retreat from the Middle East and an unwillingness to assert American influence for our interests and those of our allies" turns out to be correct or not, who's to say; but you certainly can't fault them for making it based on what they can see of the political goings-on in our society. We've been projecting an appearance of weakness, fatigue, self-doubt and lack of resolve that must truly be causing our allies sleepless nights-- and our enemies limitless delight.

I fear our grandchildren will pay a horrible price-- maybe even with their lives-- for the Democratic Party's cynical, calculated decision to play politics with the war by sucking up to the extreme Left to get $$$$, votes and election volunteers. Certainly, a "precipitous decline in our influence" will be the very least of the problems they will inherit from this country's current fecklessness.

"I wonder, how any western country is to ever fight again a successful war (not just militarly, but as a whole)? [...] With that, and until deep changes, I don't see any possible victory, with such a divide."

Good question; I've been thinking a lot about it myself. Unfortunately, I think the answer is most likely that we will not win any future war, simply because we will not fight one. I don't think the American public has the fortitude for it anymore.
Posted by Dave D.">Dave D.  2007-11-01 16:25||   2007-11-01 16:25|| Front Page Top

23:59 JAB
23:15 ed
23:13 Old Patriot
22:55 Icerigger
22:53 Thromotle Hapsburg8103
22:51 Red Dawg
22:08 Icerigger
22:03 Frank G
22:01 Zenster
21:46 Jan
21:38 trailing wife
21:34 DarthVader
21:32 trailing wife
21:30 trailing wife
21:11 Icerigger
21:07 Procopius2k
20:59 SteveS
20:58 TomAnon
20:58 Frank G
20:54 Whiskey Mike
20:53 Alaska Paul
20:47 Frank G
20:39 trailing wife
20:39 Alistaire Spains7209









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com