Article

2008-02-05 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2008-02-05 07:43|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 and just how will this dipshit enforce her "order"?

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2008-02-05 07:57|| 2008-02-05 07:57|| Front Page Top

#2 Does the Judge's order also apply to Chinese and Russian subs?
A zone off the American coast where they can't use active sonar to locate you. How convenient.

Posted by john frum 2008-02-05 08:23|| 2008-02-05 08:23|| Front Page Top

#3 Excuse me but isn't Navy operational proceedings out of bounds for the judiciary?

Also, who will pay damages in case a carrier is sunk because an iranian sub went undetected?

Posted by JFM">JFM 2008-02-05 09:07|| 2008-02-05 09:07|| Front Page Top

#4 I thought the Navy already told these folks to go piss up a rope?

Posted by mojo">mojo 2008-02-05 10:49|| 2008-02-05 10:49|| Front Page Top

#5 JFM

The judiciary knows no bounds. They have become a power upon themselves. Granting themselves powers unthought of by the founding fathers in the Constitution. They're our new aristocracy. Thus the bloody fights over appointments because they become life long tribunes over the people. We can have totally opposite decrees operative in different jurisdictions for decades. It's arbitrary and undemocratic. However political interests like it because that means they don't have to convince the body of the people of the 'nobleness' of their agenda. They simply find a sympathetic prince. Thus the unwillingness to remove judges for bad behavior which the Constitution authorizes the legislative branch. It's a convenient way of saying that even though you elected me, I can't do anything about it. Plausible Deniability

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-02-05 10:53|| 2008-02-05 10:53|| Front Page Top

#6 hows one gigantic anti-submarine net sound? sound awefully quiet wouldn't it?

Posted by swksvolFF 2008-02-05 11:22|| 2008-02-05 11:22|| Front Page Top

#7 Do you mean something like a.... drift net?

Posted by CrazyFool 2008-02-05 11:48|| 2008-02-05 11:48|| Front Page Top

#8 Yeah, but one on such a scale it would make the Gordans man crap his rubbers - talking 628 mile circumfrence one for each carrier group. Or they could get to working on un-inventing the submarine.

Posted by swksvolFF 2008-02-05 12:06|| 2008-02-05 12:06|| Front Page Top

#9 All the mroe reason to hate John McStain. He personally in the ganag of 14 held up appointments until it was FAR too late.

McCain is a dick.

Posted by OldSpook 2008-02-05 13:29|| 2008-02-05 13:29|| Front Page Top

#10 I have a dream. How about a maritime exclusion zone around the entire west coast?

Posted by ed 2008-02-05 13:37|| 2008-02-05 13:37|| Front Page Top

#11 But if the WH said they are within their rights, then would it not be true that GWB is in contempt?
what are they gonna do, toss him out of office??

Posted by USN,Ret. 2008-02-05 14:21|| 2008-02-05 14:21|| Front Page Top

#12 Next time a sub rises beneath a ship killing civilians I can imagine this Judge will regret this decision based on unknown and protentially junk science.

Posted by rjschwarz 2008-02-05 15:08|| 2008-02-05 15:08|| Front Page Top

23:30 JosephMendiola
23:24 trailing wife
23:13 trailing wife
23:02 Old Patriot
22:55 Eric Jablow
22:53 Frank G
22:47 Broadhead6
22:42 SteveS
22:30 Procopius2k
22:28 Alaska Paul
22:28 tu3031
22:25 JosephMendiola
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:16 JosephMendiola
22:11 JosephMendiola
22:08 SteveS
22:06 Frank G
21:55 gorb
21:54 gorb
21:52 trailing wife
21:47 Frank G
21:44 Anonymoose
21:43 Halliburton Data Mining Division