Article

2008-06-18 Home Front: Politix

Score tied: EADS 1, BOEING 1 USAF is in penalty box

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by USN, Ret. 2008-06-18 13:55|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 A couple key GAO findings:

The Air Force did not assess the relative merits of the tanker proposals in accordance with the criteria it established.

The Air Force conducted "misleading and unequal discussions" with Boeing by informing Boeing that it had fully satisfied a key performance objective, but later determined that Boeing had only partially met this objective.

The record did not indicate, as the Air Force claimed, that the Northrop tanker could refuel all current Air Force fixed-wing aircraft.

They screwed around with cost estimates, too.

Posted by lotp 2008-06-18 18:27|| 2008-06-18 18:27|| Front Page Top

#2 Full GAO report here

Posted by lotp 2008-06-18 18:32|| 2008-06-18 18:32|| Front Page Top

#3 The Boeing product is still a lemon, regardless of what fruit Northrop put up.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-06-18 19:32|| 2008-06-18 19:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Yeah, I hear the point you're raisin' NS, but USAF doesn't get to cherry pick among requirements once the source solicitation has been released.

Posted by lotp 2008-06-18 20:07|| 2008-06-18 20:07|| Front Page Top

#5 Thing is the Boeing jet is older airframe design, older tech, shorter ranged, and lower capacity, and need to be foreward based.

And Boeing cannot supply as many aircraft as quickly as EADS/Northrop.

All disqualifiers conpared to the EADS/Northrop offering.

The USAF screwed thign sup, but its pretty obviosu that other than idiotic jingoism, this will be yet another delay and may saddle the USAF wiuth an inferior aircraft that will have strategic consequences (requiring forward basing, lower cargo lift capacity, slower rollout and delivery).

Fore EADS to sub out parts of it for a political fig leaf. But award it and get on with production of the better aircraft.

Posted by OldSpook 2008-06-18 20:47|| 2008-06-18 20:47|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:31 rammer
23:29 crazyhorse
23:11 crazyhorse
23:10 Nero Thomose7193
23:05 Old Patriot
22:53 JohnQC
22:48 JohnQC
22:38 Frank G
22:36 JohnQC
22:35 Frank G
22:28 JohnQC
22:23 Abdominal Snowman
22:18 RD
22:15 Biff Wellington
22:00 Procopius2k
21:57 Procopius2k
21:54 OldSpook
21:44 JohnQC
21:44 Nimble Spemble
21:40 OldSpook
21:38 AlmostAnonymous5839
21:10 Besoeker
21:05 Besoeker