Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 08/25/2008 View Sun 08/24/2008 View Sat 08/23/2008 View Fri 08/22/2008 View Thu 08/21/2008 View Wed 08/20/2008 View Tue 08/19/2008
1
2008-08-25 Afghanistan
Questioning Unbeatable Insurgencies - Arnaud De Borchgrave
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2008-08-25 04:41|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 And the De Borchgrave solution is?
Posted by Besoeker 2008-08-25 08:54||   2008-08-25 08:54|| Front Page Top

#2 Apparently this was more a history lecture of a sort. I don't think he has a solution, except for mentioning this:

The United States and NATO are fast approaching decision time to take the war to Taliban's safe bases in FATA, with or without Pakistani consent. A larger aid package than the current $750 million for FATA's 3.5 million people also would have to be voted by the new U.S. Congress.

Then again he blows it with this observation:

Congress, in a classic case of cutting off its nose to spite its face, decided to cut off all military aid to South Vietnamese and Cambodian allies.

IMNSHO, it wasn't a matter of "cutting off its nose"; Congress knew what it was doing.
Posted by Pappy 2008-08-25 13:49||   2008-08-25 13:49|| Front Page Top

#3 I suspect a gentleman by the name of Petraeus has some thoughts of his own on 'unbeatable insurgencies'.
Posted by SteveS 2008-08-25 19:16||   2008-08-25 19:16|| Front Page Top

#4 It's always the case that insurgencies are unbeatable when they have an impregnable fortress, even if its walls are visible only to lawyers.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2008-08-25 19:25||   2008-08-25 19:25|| Front Page Top

#5 Despite recognizing the looming CONVENTIONAL + POTENS NUCLEAR ISLAMIST THREAT to its own national security and integrity, RUSSIA STILL DESIRES TO EMPOWER AND USE A NUCLEAR IRAN AGZ THE US-WEST/NATO-EU + MAJOR WORLD STATES vv THE "GREAT GAME". Russ is making a dangerous, potens catastrophic gamble for itself and all Asia iff its wrong, ESPEC > JAN 2009 AS PER THE POST-DUBYA NEW US NATIONAL ADMIN.

GOTTA RESPECT THE RUSS GONADS IN THEIR SITUATION.

ION Not-Necessarily-Unrelated, WAFF > THE FUTURE OF THE RUSSIAN NAVY. Return to desired NEW GREATNESS-POWER, versus FAILURE + ABSOLUTE UNSTOPPABLE GEOPOL DECLINE, IRRELEVANCE + DISAPPEARANCE???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-08-25 23:25||   2008-08-25 23:25|| Front Page Top

23:41 Andy Hupising8050
23:39 trailing wife
23:38 JosephMendiola
23:36 JosephMendiola
23:25 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:00 JosephMendiola
22:56 Sgt. Mom
22:55 trailing wife
22:54 trailing wife
22:48 JosephMendiola
22:38 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:18 Anonymoose
22:16 JosephMendiola
22:14 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:14 Anonymoose
22:07 DarthVader
22:02 trailing wife
22:02 Anonymoose
21:56 Steve White
21:55 Steve White
21:45 Besoeker









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com