Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 03/13/2009 View Thu 03/12/2009 View Wed 03/11/2009 View Tue 03/10/2009 View Mon 03/09/2009 View Sat 03/07/2009 View Fri 03/06/2009
1
2009-03-13 Home Front: WoT
Department of Justice Withdraws “Enemy Combatant” Definition for Guantanamo Detainees
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2009-03-13 17:23|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top

#1 The government’s new standard relies on the international laws of war to inform the scope of the president’s authority under this statute, and makes clear that the government does not claim authority to hold persons based on insignificant or insubstantial support of al Qaeda or the Taliban.

We will now call the former terrorists Fuzzy Bunny Muzzis insignificant to the Taliban holding a bound toilet roll formally known as the koran.
Posted by 49 Pan 2009-03-13 17:34||   2009-03-13 17:34|| Front Page Top

#2 So capturing them in combat with AK47s and not in uniform means muslim terrorists get free airplane fare home, a hero's welcome and a teenage bride. Methinks the Obama administration is putting perverse incentives into action.
Posted by ed 2009-03-13 17:45||   2009-03-13 17:45|| Front Page Top

#3 Where is the Justice in that?
Posted by newc">newc  2009-03-13 18:01||   2009-03-13 18:01|| Front Page Top

#4 So just GITMO? What about the detainees at Camp Cropper or Camp Bucca in Iraq? These guys at the Obama DoJ can only kick the can for so long on this baby.
Posted by DepotGuy 2009-03-13 18:04||   2009-03-13 18:04|| Front Page Top

#5 "insignificant or insubstantial support of al Qaeda or the Taliban."

So does the purden of proof for "insignificant or insubstantial vs significant or substantial support" rest with Private Suffy..., or must he call to the rear and get a legal opinion prior to detaining someone? This is a very dangerous finding and will eventually effect or ROE. But of course, that's probably the intent.
Posted by Besoeker  2009-03-13 18:06||   2009-03-13 18:06|| Front Page Top

#6 ION PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM > WORLD POPULATION TO RISE TO 9.0BILYUHN BY 2050. PAKISTAN RANKED FIFTH IN NUMBER OF EMIGRANTS [USA ranked #1 in migrant destination].

ALso from PDF > IMMIGRANTS WILL COMPRISE 40% OF HOUSEHOLDS IN THE UK.

IOW, DARE THE GITMO MIL-TERR DETAINEES BE FUTURE US CITIZENS AND IMMIGRANT RESIDENT-WORKERS???

* REMINDER > AMERICAN DREAM DECLINES/FADES TO GUAM RUMOR FOR IRAQIS [sent to Guam].
Posted by JosephMendiola 2009-03-13 19:11||   2009-03-13 19:11|| Front Page Top

#7 How about we classify them as serial or mass murderers then?
Posted by JohnQC 2009-03-13 19:33||   2009-03-13 19:33|| Front Page Top

#8 #7 How about we classify them as serial or mass murderers then? Posted by: JohnQC

Absolutely, and we label the O'Bambi administration as accessories after the fact.

If ONE American dies as the result of this stupidity, Obama, Emanuel, and the Attorney General all three need to hang from lamp posts in DC.
Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot  2009-03-13 22:13|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]  2009-03-13 22:13|| Front Page Top

23:50 ed
23:45 trailing wife
23:40 tu3031
23:38 trailing wife
23:33 trailing wife
23:28 tu3031
23:28 logi_cal
23:25 trailing wife
23:17 trailing wife
23:13 logi_cal
23:12 trailing wife
22:52 Old Patriot
22:25 Glenmore
22:13 Old Patriot
22:12 ed
22:09 ed
22:06 tu3031
22:06 Barbara Skolaut
22:04 Besoeker
22:03 ed
21:58 Barbara Skolaut
21:38 Anonymoose
21:28 Warthog
21:24 lotp









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com