Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 04/14/2009 View Mon 04/13/2009 View Sun 04/12/2009 View Sat 04/11/2009 View Fri 04/10/2009 View Thu 04/09/2009 View Wed 04/08/2009
1
2009-04-14 Science & Technology
PG&E makes deal for space solar power!
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2009-04-14 11:25|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Interesting but it says nothing about how radio-requency transmissions to a receiving station in Fresno are converted to electrical energy. How does that work? Or does it? And if it does then couldn't anybody with the right equipment also receive those transmissions and convert them to energy, thus ripping off Solaren and PG&E? Is this a practical idea or a pipe dream?
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-04-14 12:16||   2009-04-14 12:16|| Front Page Top

#2 Big-ass antenna outside Fresno. High-power RF blanketing the area.

What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by mojo 2009-04-14 12:33||   2009-04-14 12:33|| Front Page Top

#3 I see it as possible, but transmission losses for beamed power will keep it from being much more than a PR stunt, The transmission straight down is the problem, satellite to satellite have NO losses due to air dissipation.

(Beam spreading and length of transmission have their own losses)

But a beam powerful enough to generate enough electricity to use is a deadly microwave beam, all aircraft must divert or be fried.
Posted by Redneck Jim">Redneck Jim  2009-04-14 12:36||   2009-04-14 12:36|| Front Page Top

#4 The detail,including the safety considerations were worked out by space freaks SD & Space enthusiasts in 1980es, mojo. Of course, between Soody owned pols and envirowackos, it'll never be build in USA---you'll just have for India and/or China to do it.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2009-04-14 13:06||   2009-04-14 13:06|| Front Page Top

#5 Ooops, I meant "SF &"
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2009-04-14 13:07||   2009-04-14 13:07|| Front Page Top

#6 What could possibly go wrong?

Nothing. Whatever did not go according to plan would only result in an improvement to Fresno.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2009-04-14 13:11||   2009-04-14 13:11|| Front Page Top

#7 grom: And HOW big does the antenna need to be to reduce the power density of the RF to safe levels?...

Not saying it wouldn't work. I'm saying it'll never happen. Too much land tied up under the antenna, too many fluffy bunnies or spotted snakes displaced/inconvenienced, etc. etc.

We're talking California here.
Posted by mojo 2009-04-14 14:16||   2009-04-14 14:16|| Front Page Top

23:55 Gluting Fillmore6653
23:46 JosephMendiola
23:45 JosephMendiola
23:37 JosephMendiola
23:17 CrazyFool
22:43 Bright Pebbles the flatulent
22:41 Barbara Skolaut
22:31 Mike N.
22:29 Aussie Mike
22:27 whatadeal
22:18 trailing wife in Buffalo
22:16 whatadeal
22:09 Mike N.
21:57 Nimble Spemble
21:53 Nimble Spemble
21:52 Nimble Spemble
21:45 Besoeker
21:43 trailing wife in Buffalo
21:43 Besoeker
21:39 trailing wife in Buffalo
21:30 Alaska Paul
21:25 Kofi Flomotch5556
21:25 phil_b
21:23 Mike N.









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com