Article

2009-11-15 -Lurid Crime Tales-

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by crosspatch 2009-11-15 01:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 It would be interesting to see who else's stealth coating technology has similar problems.

Posted by gorb 2009-11-15 03:48|| 2009-11-15 03:48|| Front Page Top

#2 ...The original coatings on the B-2 turned out to be pretty much useless in real service (in some cases requiring a near complete reapply after every flight), but since they came online the USAF has steadily increased their strength and durability. On the other hand, it's never going to be what they wanted. What I'm hearing from friends at Langley AFB (1 Fighter Wing, three squadrons of -22s) is that there are some issues with the coatings not holding up under wear and tear, but nothing that sounds as bad as this. The bottom line though is that as the article mentions, it's more design than the coatings.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2009-11-15 05:40|| 2009-11-15 05:40|| Front Page Top

#3 If you have to re-paint every panel and fastener opened for maintenance I can see why the maintenance hours. And you KNOW the leadership will not allow scruffy looking AC even if the coating does not effect the low observable properties very much.

Posted by tipover 2009-11-15 13:19|| 2009-11-15 13:19|| Front Page Top

#4 So, give Gates credit for canceling the -22 assembly line?

Posted by Mizzou Mafia 2009-11-15 15:51|| 2009-11-15 15:51|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:50 ed
23:38 trailing wife
23:31 lex
23:28 lex
23:26 Secret Master
23:20 Pappy
23:20 gorb
23:05 Pappy
23:05 49 Pan
22:53 Pappy
22:41 crosspatch
22:36 Aussie Mike
22:29 Aussie Mike
22:23 Cornsilk Blondie
22:14 M. Murcek
22:09 trailing wife
22:06 Barbara Skolaut
21:51 Angie Schultz
21:43 phil_b
21:43 crosspatch
21:42 crosspatch
21:42 Old Patriot
21:29 phil_b