Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 12/09/2009 View Tue 12/08/2009 View Mon 12/07/2009 View Sun 12/06/2009 View Sat 12/05/2009 View Fri 12/04/2009 View Thu 12/03/2009
1
2009-12-09 Home Front: Politix
US says carbon shift is boost to Copenhagen
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2009-12-09 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 So in other words the EPA labeled CO2 (aka Plant Food) a 'dangerous pollutant' purely due to POLITICAL reasons and not scientific reasons.

Why am I not suprised?
Posted by CrazyFool 2009-12-09 00:27||   2009-12-09 00:27|| Front Page Top

#2 Well, CF, it's easier for them to pass this regulation than it is for them to stop emitting it.

I'm waiting for them to go after dihydrogen minoxide next. That crap's in everything!!
Posted by Cornsilk Blondie 2009-12-09 00:48||   2009-12-09 00:48|| Front Page Top

#3 The impact on humanity of man-made drought, flood,

Which of course will happen everywhere simultaneously.

Trash peddled to morons.
Posted by phil_b 2009-12-09 04:03||   2009-12-09 04:03|| Front Page Top

#4 Crazyfool is right, CO2 is a fertilizer. CO2 gas enrichment is a common strategy for supercharging growth in your "closet garden". Plants BREATHE the stuff! They take in CO2 and release pure Oxygen. It's part of the circle of life.
Posted by Scooter McGruder 2009-12-09 05:17||   2009-12-09 05:17|| Front Page Top

#5 All of us exhale CO2 when we breathe. So is the EPA going to regulate the breathing by animals? What a bunch of morons. Plant a tree and get over this tree-hugger B.S. In the end it the administration fall back position if cap and trade doesn't pass-just have the EPA regulate the environoment. BO promised the most transparent administration; it does seem that most people are on to this administrations slight of hand.
Posted by JohnQC 2009-12-09 08:23||   2009-12-09 08:23|| Front Page Top

#6 All of us exhale CO2 when we breathe. So is the EPA going to regulate the breathing by animals?

In fact there is a movement for voluntary extinction of mankind. Notice that doesn't necessarily mean that individual deaths are voluntary.
Posted by JFM">JFM  2009-12-09 11:42||   2009-12-09 11:42|| Front Page Top

#7 JFM: Do the people signing up for this movement volunteer to go first? Or is it one of those "Everyone else needs to do this while we don't" movements, as usual?
Posted by Charles 2009-12-09 16:42||   2009-12-09 16:42|| Front Page Top

#8 "All of us exhale CO2 when we breathe."

Don't worry: Inhaling is still ok, only exhaling is not.

Water vapor has a much bigger influence on climate.

Stand by
Posted by European Conservative 2009-12-09 19:54||   2009-12-09 19:54|| Front Page Top

23:55 JosephMendiola
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:40 USN, Ret.
23:28 USN, Ret.
23:27 KBK
23:17 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
22:53 JosephMendiola
22:44 JosephMendiola
22:35 Bright Pebbles
22:32 Bright Pebbles
22:16 Iblis
22:10 Pappy
22:08 DMFD
21:50 JosephMendiola
21:44 rn
21:42 eLarson
21:41 Skunky Glins****
21:40 rn
21:34 JosephMendiola
21:29 JosephMendiola
21:23 JosephMendiola
21:21 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com