Article

2010-12-02 Home Front: Culture Wars

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2010-12-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top
File under: Global Jihad

#1 A native of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Miles-LaGrange, received a certificate from the University of Ghana in Accra, Ghana, West Africa in 1973, and graduated cum laude from Vassar College in 1974. She then received her J.D. from Howard University in Washington, DC in 1977. There, she was an editor of The Howard Law Journal.

Why does this sound vaguely familiar?

Posted by Anonymoose 2010-12-02 08:41|| 2010-12-02 08:41|| Front Page Top

#2 It is of my humble opinion this amendment is not anti-muslim, anti-amish, anti-anything. It is the confirmation that state and federal application of death taxes, or any tax and/or law, takes priority over religious or cultural considerations. What a person does afterwards is then left up to the person or organization. It includes estate planning, the ability to add interest to back taxes, to prevention of UN waterway control and taxes, the whole shabang.

What you do not realize dipwad is by winning this case, you will create the need for people to register their religion in order to receive proper recognition. That means you must declare which religious center you belong to, and must sign in every visit in order to prove you are not evading the state's/federal mandate by law to intrude on your estate planning. You want exemption to plan your estate according to your belief without government interference then work to abolish estate taxes.

There have been outside the legal system arbitration since forever, but once a law has been broken it is government's mandate to investigate and process equally unto all. You want a religious verdict stating a woman should not drive there is no law against that, muslim or amish, so long as the woman agrees. Now, if that woman lodges a complaint with the authorities stating she is being forced to stay in the house or whatnot then it is the authoriy's responsibility to investigate kidnapping, unlawful detainment, whatever local regs are. To not do so errodes that authority, errodes the people's trust in those lawfully ordaned to perform the job of law and order, which creates discontent, which creates jealousy and/or resentment, which makes people pissed at individuals like you, ya shitwad.

My take on it at least, any legal or OK people if I'm wrong on details please correct me.

Posted by swksvolFF 2010-12-02 12:37|| 2010-12-02 12:37|| Front Page Top

00:02 Broadhead6
23:55 JosephMendiola
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:48 Broadhead6
23:40 Barbara Skolaut
23:24 abu do you love
23:11 Anonymoose
23:07 Uleatch Dribble8106
23:07 Uleatch Dribble8106
22:09 ryuge
21:49 Rambler in Virginia
21:30 retired LEO
21:30 Anonymoose
21:29 Anonymoose
21:29 Frank G
21:21 Frank G
21:17 abu do you love
21:04 tu3031
21:03 lotp
21:00 abu do you love
20:56 abu do you love
20:48 lotp
20:41 abu do you love
20:36 Frank G