Article

2011-01-07 Science & Technology

Climate Craziness of the week: a basic science question for NYT reporter Justin Gillis

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2011-01-07 18:18|| || Front Page|| [8 views ] Top

#1 Good Artic + Math.

Unfortunately, the basic glitch remains the same, i.e. the ACCURACY = RELIABILITY OF SOLAR BEHAVIOR/SOLAR STORM-FLARE MODELS espec as per MSM-Net, Pert-forecasted STARTING-IN-2012/2013 TECHS-, CIVILIZATION-DAMAGING? [iff not DESTROYING?] SOLAR STORMS???

MATH > essens indics or infers that for the various PERTS' forecasts to be accurate as above, THE SCALE = MAGNITUDE OF THE ANTICIPATED 2012/2013-after SOLAR STORMS-FLARES MUST BE WORSE OR HIGHER THAN IS BEING PUBLICLY STATED.

D *** NGED ISAAC NEWTON + MURPHY'S LAWS, etc.!

But I digress...

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-01-07 19:24|| na 2011-01-07 19:24|| Front Page Top

#2 JosephM, until the 'perts can at least predict the past accurately, we can't much trust their predictions of the future. The only thing that seems certain is that Guam is not going to sink under the waves any time soon... nor go over like a tilt table if too many American troops land on one side without balance on the other.

Posted by trailing wife 2011-01-07 23:21|| 2011-01-07 23:21|| Front Page Top

00:01 RandomJD
23:59 SteveS
23:48 SteveS
23:41 trailing wife
23:39 RandomJD
23:23 CrazyFool
23:21 trailing wife
22:51 trailing wife
22:43 twobyfour
22:25 JosephMendiola
22:18 JosephMendiola
22:16 JosephMendiola
21:47 Frank G
21:42 SteveS
21:31 Frank G
21:09 Rambler in Virginia
21:05 AzCat
21:01 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:43 Nimble Spemble
20:41 Capsu78
19:51 bigjim-CA
19:37 JosephMendiola
19:34 JosephMendiola
19:29 JosephMendiola